Economic Reporting Review
By Dean Baker
June 24, 2002
Outstanding Stories of the Week
Big Accounting Firm's Tax Plans Help the Wealthy Conceal Income
David Cay Johnston
New York Times, June 20, 2002, Page A1
This article reports on some of the tricks used
by Ernst & Young, one of the nation's largest accounting firms, to allow
wealthy clients to evade their taxes.
The Enforcers of Wall St.? Then Again, Maybe Not
Gretchen Morgenson
New York Times, June 20, 2002, Page C1
This article reports on the firing of two
executives at major financial firms who were fired when they tried to expose
illegal or unethical actions by others in their firms. The article indicates
that people are more likely to be punished than rewarded for calling attention
to improper conduct.
Mexican Workers Pay for Success
Mary Jordon
Washington Post, June 20, 2002, Page A1
This article reports on the movement of factory jobs from Mexico to China. While
pay in Mexico is far lower than in the United States, workers in China are often
paid less than one quarter of what they earn in Mexico. As a result, firms that
are looking for the lowest-cost labor are moving their facilities from Mexico to
China.
Peru
Support for Toledo Wanes As Peru's Poor Get Poorer
Scott Wilson
Washington Post, June 16, 2002, Page A22
This article reports on the drop in public
support for Peru's President, Alejandro Toledo. The article reports at some
length Mr. Toledo's support of fiscal conservatism and other policies, which it
claims are "delighting foreign investors." It then refers to
endorsements by international business interests as "macroeconomic
successes."
While it is possible that a favorable business environment can lead to strong
economic growth and benefits for the whole country, this is not always the
outcome. Pleasing foreign investors, by itself, does not constitute
macroeconomic success. The only discussion of economic growth in this article
notes that Peru is projected to have 3.7 percent growth in 2002. This is weak
growth for a developing nation, although with much of the world still feeling
the effects of the recession, it is a better performance than that of many other
developing nations.
Stanley Fischer and Citigroup
Citigroup Fills International Post
Dow Jones / AP
New York Times, June 19, 2002, Page C4
This article reports on the Citigroup's
announcement that it had selected Stanley Fischer, the former first deputy
managing director at the I.M.F. The article notes the I.M.F.'s involvement in
the East Asian and Russian financial crises during these periods, and asserts
that, "he was an important figure in organizing aid packages to rescue
these economies."
Given the large drop in GDP resulting from the East Asian financial crisis, and
the fact that several economies continued to shrink even
after receiving I.M.F. aid, it is questionable whether the I.M.F.
"rescued" these nations. In the case of Russia, the I.M.F. continued
to provide support through the first half of 1998, as long as Russia followed an
economic program approved by the I.M.F. This program included maintaining its
currency at a fixed exchange rate with the dollar. This proved untenable, and in
August of 1998 Russia gave up its peg and suspended payments on its debt. This
led to a financial crisis, which worsened the economic situation temporarily,
but by the end of the year Russia's economy was growing again. This renewed
growth occurred at a time when Russia had broken off its dealings with the I.M.F.
Therefore it is not clear that any I.M.F. "rescue" or "attempted
rescue" of Russia occurred during Stanley Fischer's tenure as deputy
managing director.
Social Security
Report Predicts Deep Benefit Cuts Under Bush Social Security Plan
Richard W. Stevenson
New York Times, June 19, 2002, Page A22
This article discusses a new report that projects
the benefits cuts implied by the plans designed by President Bush's Social
Security Commission. At one point it notes that "by 2041, Social Security
would exhaust its 'trust fund' of bonds." There is no obvious reason that
the words "trust fund" should appear in quotation marks. It is the
proper name for the reserve fund held by the Social Security program. Using
quotation marks to describe the trust fund is comparable to
using quotation marks for the "State Department" or "Supreme
Court."
Housing Starts
Housing Starts Rise 11.6%, Easily Top Expectations
Sandra Fleishman
Washington Post, June 19, 2002, Page E1
Home Building Up Sharply; Price Index Flat
Reuters
New York Times, June 19, 2002, Page C2
These articles discuss the release of new data
from the Commerce Department that showed a sharp increase in housing starts in
May compared to the level reported for April. Both articles report that this
data implies continued strength in the housing market. Monthly housing data is
extremely erratic. The March and April data both showed sharp declines in
housing starts. It is likely that part of the increase reported for May was
attributable to housing starts that took place in April, but were misreported
for some reason. Such misreporting would both lower the number of starts
reported for April and raise the starts reported in May. Even with the jump in
reported starts in May, the level was still below the figure reported for
February.
Home Ownership Among Minorities
Bush Calls for Increasing Minority Homeownership
Dana Milbank
Washington Post, June 18, 2002, Page A2
Bush Calls Transformed Area A Model Program for Housing
David E. Sanger
New York Times, June 18, 2002, Page A19
These articles discuss several initiatives by the
Bush Administration which are supposed to reduce the gap in the homeownership
rate between black and Hispanic families and white families. Currently this gap
is approximately 26 percentage points. The articles report that one of the
programs would subsidize the down payment of 40,000 low-income families a year.
The other program would provide a tax credit to builders for 200,000 low-income
homes.
There are currently approximately 18 million black and Hispanic families (9
million of each). If half of these subsidies go to black and Hispanic families
buying homes for the first time (twice their share of the population), and there
is no overlap between beneficiaries of the two programs, then after ten years
the programs will have increased the homeownership rate among these minorities
by less than 1.6 percentage points, an amount equal to approximately 6 percent
of the current gap in homeownership rates. It would have been helpful to include
information on the number of black and Hispanic families so that readers could
better assess the size of these programs relative to the magnitude of the
problem.
Trade
Bush's Popularity Isn't Aiding GOP Domestic Agenda
Dana Milbank
Washington Post, June 16, 2002, Page A4
This article discusses President Bush's
unwillingness to use his personal popularity to advance the agenda of
conservatives within the
Republican party. At one point it refers to President Bush's efforts to pass
"free trade legislation." It is inaccurate to characterize
this legislation as "free-trade." Many of the items that are being
discussed in current negotiations have little to do with trade, such as rules
governing health and safety restrictions. In some cases the Bush Administration
is actually trying to increase barriers to trade, for example through
increasingly stringent patent and copyright protection. It would be more
accurate to refer to these negotiations as covering simply "trade" or
"commercial" arrangements.
H.M.O.'s and Medicare Drug Benefits
Experts Wary of G.O.P. Drug Plan
Robert Pear
New York Times, June 16, 2002, Page A17
This informative article discusses the views of a
number of health policy experts who are skeptical of the ability of private
insurers to efficiently provide insurance for prescription drugs to the elderly.
At two points the article refers to efforts to keep down Medicare costs through
the increased use of H.M.O.'s. It would have been helpful to point out the
General Accounting Office's finding that H.M.O.'s raised the cost of serving
Medicare beneficiaries, instead of lowering it.
House GOP Offers Third Hill Plan for Prescription Drugs
Amy Goldstein and Jim VandeHei
Washington Post, June 18, 2002, Page A4
House G.O.P. Offers Bill for Drug Payments for the Elderly
Robert Pear
New York Times, June 18, 2002, Page A18
These articles report on a Republican proposal
that would provide $350 billion over the next decade to subsidize prescription
drugs for senior citizens. According to the Congressional Budget Office, senior
citizens will spend $1,773 billion on prescription drugs over this period,
which means that the program would cover approximately one fifth of their total
costs. Since the cost of prescription drugs is projected to more than double
over the decade after adjusting for inflation senior citizens would face higher
drug expenses in 2012 than they do at present, even with the Republican drug
plan in place.
Food Subsidies and Developing Nations
Raising Farm Subsidies, U.S. Widens International Rift
Elizabeth Becker
New York Times, June 15, 2002, Page A3
This article reports on criticisms of U.S. farm
subsidies by people who claim that they will hurt developing nations. Insofar as
farm subsidies have the effect of lowering the price of U.S. farm products in
world markets, their impact is identical to a drop in the dollar or an increase
in agricultural productivity. Anyone who believes that a decline in U.S. farm
prices due to government subsidies is harmful to developing nations must also
believe that a decline of the same magnitude attributable to an over-valued
dollar or increased productivity is equally harmful.
At one point the article describes the subsidies in the farm bill as a
"huge" increase over the prior subsidy level, later saying that the
bill provides for an 80 percent increase in subsidy levels. In fact, the new
farm bill provides an average of $18 billion annually in subsidies. This is 80
percent larger in nominal dollars (about 50 percent in real dollars) than the
subsidy specified in the last farm bill. However, Congress has approved
emergency assistance for farmers the last three years, raising the actual
subsidy level to $20 billion. This means that the subsidies written into the new
farm bill imply a decrease, in both nominal and real dollars, relative to
current spending on farm subsidies.
Corporate Accounting
Higher Fees Ahead for Reshaped Accounting Sector
Matt Moore
Washington Post, June 17, 2002, Page A5
This article reports that the fees charged by
accounting firms are likely to go up as a result of the conviction of Arthur
Anderson. It bases this assertion on the statement of the Dean of an Accounting
School, that the conviction will lead firms to be more careful in documenting
their conduct and auditing procedures, which will require more time and lead to
more costs.
It is not clear that the conviction will require more documentation of audits.
Arthur Anderson was convicted of deliberately falsifying audits, not of being
negligent in its record keeping. There is no reason to believe that a firm which
did not intend to violate the law would have run into the same sort of problems.
It is also possible that the conviction will make it easier for accounting firms
to ensure that their employees respect the law. If accountants fear public
disclosure and prosecution of illegal conduct, which could ruin their
professional career, they will be less likely to engage in improper behavior. In
this way, the conviction may allow firms to get by with less monitoring and
thereby save money.
The Stock Market and the Economy
No Market Rebound Until Companies Come Clean
Jerry Knight
Washington Post, June 17, 2002, Page E1
This article discusses the fact that the stock
market has been slumping even while the economy appears to be recovering. It
interprets this divergence in directions as a case of where the stock market
"is not reflecting the economy." In fact, the ratio of stock prices to
corporate earnings is still more than 20 to 1. This is far above the historic
average of less than 15 to 1. The fact that the market is declining can be seen
as evidence that it is reflecting the economy. Its extraordinary rise in the
late nineties was not reflecting the actual growth of corporate profits.
The Budget
Deficit to Top $100 Billion, CBO Says
Compiled from reports by the Associated Press and Reuters
Washington Post, June 15, 2002, Page A7
This short article reports on new projections
from the Congressional Budget Office, that the deficit for 2002 will exceed $100
billion. The article describes this as "ominous fiscal news." Even
with this new projection, the deficit on the unified budget will be less than
1.5 percent of GDP, and the deficit on the "on-budget" budget
(non-Social Security) will be approximately 3 percent of GDP. Deficits of this
magnitude can be sustained indefinitely. There is nothing especially ominous
about running a deficit of this magnitude, especially in a year when tax
collections are depressed due to a recession.
The article attributes the increase in the projected deficit to the new farm
bill and a new set of tax cuts passed this year. By far the main factor behind
the rise in the projected deficit is a sharp drop in capital gains tax revenue.
As a result of the drop in the stock market the last two years, capital gains
tax revenue will fall below projections by more than $60 billion this year.