Economic Reporting Review
By Dean Baker
August 22, 2005
In This Issue:
• Outstanding
Stories of the Week
• The Budget
• Gas Prices
and the Economy
• Russia
• Social Security
• Movie
Subsidies
• Airlines
• Brazil
•
El Salvador
•
France
You can sign
up to receive ERR and other CEPR e-newsletters at the
CEPR Listserve Signup Page. You can find the latest ERR at the
Economic Reporting Review Main Page.
Outstanding
Stories
of the Week
Doctors’ Links With Investors Raise
Concerns
Stephanie Saul and Jenny Anderson
New
York Times,
August 16, 2005, Page A1
This article reports on a growing trend among doctors performing clinical
trials, in which they get paid to discuss their progress with investors. The
article points out the potential risks for both the integrity of the medical
research and the possibility for insider trading by investors.
Back to Top
Death Tax? Double Tax? For Most, It’s No
Tax
Edmund L. Andrews
New
York Times, August 14, 2005, Page, Section 3, Page 4
This
article discusses some of the issues raised in connection with the proposed
repeal of the estate tax. It points out that in many instances the money in the
estates of wealthy individuals has never been taxed, because it was in the form
of unrealized capital gains in a business, stock, or real estate.
Back to Top
In Health Care, a Race Gap Persists
Rob Stein
Washington
Post,
August 18, 2005, Page A1
This article reports on several new studies that show that a racial gap in
health outcomes and treatment persists. The studies found that there has been
relatively little progress in reducing racial disparities in many categories of
treatment and in some categories, the disparities have actually increased.
Back to Top
Break on Foreign-Profit Tax Means Billions
to U.S. Firms
Jonathan Weisman
Washington
Post,
August 19, 2005, Page D1
This article
examines the extent to which U.S. firms are taking advantage of a special
one-year tax holiday that allows firms to repatriate foreign profits at a tax
rate of just 5.25 percent. The tax holiday was supposed to lead to a surge in
investment, but the article reports that it is having very little impact on
firms’ investment decisions.
Back to Top
The
Budget
Deficit Forecast Lowered for 2005
Nell Henderson
Washington
Post,
August 16, 2005, Page D1
Surge in Corporate Taxes Is expected to Reduce Deficit
Robert Pear
New
York Times,
August 16, 2005, Page A16
These
articles report on a new set of budget projections from the Congressional Budget
Office (CBO) that show the deficit will be somewhat lower in 2005 than
previously predicted. It would have been helpful to readers if the deficit
numbers were reported as a share of GDP, since almost no readers are able to
understand the significance of a $331 billion deficit (the new projection for
2005). It is only the size of the deficit relative to GDP that matters for the
economy, not the nominal size of the deficit. (By analogy, for most people a $1
million debt would be a big deal. However, for Bill Gates a $1 million dollar
debt is trivial. The important issue is the size of the debt relative
to one’s wealth or income.)
This distinction is important because politicians try to manipulate these
numbers for their political ends. For example, the Times
article quotes Representative John M. Spratt Jr. as describing the deficits of
2003 and 2004 as the “worst in history.” While this is true if the deficit
is measured in nominal dollars, it is not true if the deficit is measured
relative to the size of the economy. The deficits of those years (including
borrowing from Social Security) were 5.0 and ,9 percent of GDP, respectively. By
contrast, the deficit was 6.0 percent of GDP in 1983 and close to 5.0 percent in
1991 and 1992. Measured as a share of GDP, the deficits in these earlier years
would be larger, whether or not Social Security borrowing is included.
At one point the Times article reports
that spending on Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid will double in the
coming decade. Actually, most of the projected increase in spending in these
three programs is attributable to rising private sector health care costs that
are projected to push up Medicare and Medicaid spending. After adjusting for
inflation, Social Security spending is projected to increase by approximately
one-third over the next decade.
The Post article asserts that the CBO
projection of a $331 billion deficit “relies on spending $173 billion in
surplus Social Security tax revenue.” Actually, this measure relies on counting
this borrowed money as revenue for the general budget. Anyone who chooses to use
a deficit number that does not count money borrowed from Social Security is free
to do so. Most reporters (or their editors) have chosen to include the money
borrowed from Social Security as revenue for the government, thereby reporting a
substantially smaller deficit than the actual amount that is being borrowed to
finance the general budget.
One of the main factors lowering the budget deficit for 2005 was a special tax
clause that allowed firms to repatriate foreign earnings in 2005 at an
exceptionally low tax rate. Many firms have chosen to take advantage of this tax
break, which has led to a one-time surge in corporate tax revenue, which will
not be repeated in future years.
Back to Top
Gas
Prices and the Economy
Consumer Prices Increase, Outstrip Wages
Nell Henderson
Washington
Post,
August 17, 2005, Page D1
This informative article assesses the impact of higher gas prices at the
economy. At one point it quotes an economist who asserts that higher gas prices
are helping to keep down the core rate of inflation by reducing overall demand
and thereby imposing downward pressure on prices. While higher gas prices take
money out of consumers’ pockets, it is also likely that higher gas prices will
lead to more upward pressure on wages, as workers try to compensate for higher
prices. More rapid wage growth will lead to higher prices, thereby increasing
inflation.
Thus
far in the recovery, the labor market has been so weak that workers have been
forced to largely absorb the increase in energy costs, and see their real wages
decline. Presumably, at some point in this business cycle, the labor market will
be tight enough that workers will at least be able to push up their wages enough
to keep pace with inflation.
Back to Top
Russia
Pervasive Corruption in Russia Is ‘Just Called
Business’
Steven Lee Myers
New
York Times,
August 13, 2005, Page A3
This
article reports on the growth of government corruption in Russia during the
Putin presidency. It implies that corruption is now qualitatively worse in
Russia than it had been in the past.
The article presents no evidence that would support this view. During the tenure
of the previous president, Boris Yeltsin, a vast amount of government owned
industry passed into private hands at a fraction of its market value. It is
widely recognized that the individuals who purchased these assets at below
market prices, and became billionaires in the process, did so as a result of
their government connections. Nothing described in this article suggests that
corruption in the Putin administration has approached the levels reached in the
Yeltsin years.
In fact, some of the evidence in the article suggests that corruption is
decreasing, not increasing. Not increasing. For example, the article presents
the results of a poll that showed that the percentage of people who paid a bribe
in a situation where it may have been to their benefit fell from 75 percent in
2001 to 53 percent in 2005. It also shows that the estimates of the bribes paid
to traffic police have been cut in half during this period.
Back to Top
Social
Security
Happy 70th Birthday, Social Security
Jonathan Weisman
Washington
Post,
August 14, 2005, Page A5
This article discusses the prospects of
various proposals to restructure Social Security on the 70th
anniversary of the signing of the bill that created Social Security. At one
point it refers to 2041, which it describes as the date when the Social Security
actuaries project that the program will first face a shortfall. Actually, this
is the date projected by the Social Security trustees, four out six of whom are
political appointees of President Bush.
The trustees projections are considerably more pessimistic than the projections
of the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO). CBO projects that the
program can pay all benefits through the year 2052 if no changes are made. The
trustees projections rely on some peculiar assumptions. For example, they assume
that productivity will grow at a rate considerably slower than that assumed by
CBO, or by President Bush’s Office of Management and Budget in their budget
projections. The trustees also assume that immigration will be considerably
slower in the decades when the retirement of the baby boom cohort is creating a
labor shortage than it was in the nineties.
At one point the article describes a Republican proposal as “dedicating
Social Security taxes to Social Security.” All Social Security taxes are
already dedicated to Social Security. Under the law, every penny in Social
Security taxes is either used to pay current benefits or to buy U.S. government
bonds. The bonds will be used to help defray Social Security expenses in the
future when the baby boom cohort retirees. Therefore, unless Congress votes to
default on the bonds held by the Social Security trust fund, all money that is
paid in Social Security taxes will be used for Social Security.
Back to Top
Movie
Subsidies
California Considers Tax Breaks For Filming
David M. Halbfinger
New
York Times,
August 18, 2005, Page B1
This article
reports on a proposal being considered by the California legislature that would
give a refundable tax credit to movie companies that film in California. The
article reports that the credit will not subsidize the high salaries of movie
stars, because it can only be applied against the first $25,000 of salary. It
also reports that overhead and distribution expenses will not count for
collecting the tax credit, thereby ensuring that the credit will go to job
creation.
Neither of these claims is true. Even with very optimistic assumptions
about the credit’s impact, the vast majority of the subsidies will go to movie
companies that would have filmed in California anyhow. The credit will be
additional money that the movie companies can use as they like. This includes
increasing the salaries of top stars or for increased expenditures for
distribution, or simply for higher profits. Restricting the categories of
expenses that are used to calculate the tax credit will have a minimal effect on
the distribution of gains from the tax credit.
Back to Top
Airlines
Circling a Decision
Micheline Maynard and Jeremy W. Peters
New
York Times,
August 18, 2005, Page C1
This article
discusses Northwest Airlines prospects and the likelihood that it will file for
bankruptcy. The article is accompanied by a large chart showing trends among
major airlines in costs per passenger mile. This is not necessarily a good
comparison, because some airlines fly a much higher percentage of short-distance
flights than others. It would be expected that these airlines have higher costs,
but their revenue would also be correspondingly higher on a per mile basis. (It
does not cost ten times as much to fly from New York to Los Angeles as from New
York to Washington, D.C, even though the distance is more than ten times as
great.)
Back to Top
Brazil
Brazils’ Opposition Shelters President From
Scandal, for Now
Larry Rohter
New
York Times,
August 14, 2005, Page A3
This article reports on how the
political opposition in Brazil appears anxious to keep the president, Luiz
Inacio Lula da Silva, in power, despite the fact that he has been implicated in
a major scandal involving illegal campaign financing and alleged bribery.. At
one point it describes Brazil’s economy as “robust” and later refers to
record exports, and falling interest rates.
Actually, Brazil’s economy is currently growing at less than a 3.0 percent
annual rate. This is a very slow growth rate for a developing country,
especially since Brazil is still recovering from the effects of a recession
earlier in the decade. Most countries have record exports most years, because
their economy is growing and the trade share of output is growing. Therefore
having record exports reveals little about a country’s economic success –
it’s comparable to saying that a person is older today than he has ever been
before. Brazil’s short-term interest rate is still at 19.75 percent. With an
inflation rate near 7.0 percent, this is still an extremely high interest rate
by any standard, even though it had been even higher (in nominal terms) in
2002-2003.
Back to Top
El
Salvador
El Salvador’s Hunger Shows at Tuna Plant
Krissah Williams
Washington
Post,
August 16, 2005, Page D1
This article reports on the hopes of
some Salvadorans that CAFTA will increase the country’s growth rate. It would
have been appropriate to note that the U.S. import market is virtually certain
to contract sharply over the next decade, since it is unlikely that Japan and
China’s central banks will continue to finance large U.S. trade deficits
throughout the decade (see “Fools’
Gold: Projections of the U.S. Import Market,” ). This means that El
Salvador will only be able to increase its exports to the U.S. if it can take
away market share from countries like China and Mexico.
The article also does not mention the damage to El Salvador’s economy that
will result from paying higher prices for drugs and other items subject to
patent or copyright protection. Research from the World Bank suggests that this
damage could be substantial.
Back to Top
France
French Economy Grew Only 0.1% in Last Quarter
Associated Press
New
York Times, August 13, 2005, Page B2
This article
reports on a new data showing that the French economy grew at just a 0.4 percent
annual rate in the second quarter. The article expresses this as 0.1 percent,
the quarterly rate of growth. (It also expresses France’s first quarter growth
as a quarterly rate.) It is standard in the United States to express GDP growth
as an annual rate. It would be helpful to readers if the article simply reported
French growth at an annualized rate.
Back to Top
Dean Baker is Co-Director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington, D.C.