Economic Reporting Review
 By Dean Baker

October 3, 2005

In This Issue:

 Outstanding Stories of the Week
 
The Chinese Yuan
 
Debt Relief
 
Energy Production and the Price of Oil
 
Housing Sales and Prices
  Greenspan on the Economy
  The IMF and Protectionism
  Italy



You can sign up to receive ERR and other CEPR e-newsletters at the CEPR Listserve Signup Page. You can find the latest ERR at the Economic Reporting Review Main Page.  


Outstanding Stories of the Week

Many Contracts For Storm Work Raise Questions
Eric Lipton and Ron Nixon
New York Times, September 26, 2005, Page A1


This article reports on a number of no bid contracts, issued as part of the Hurricane Katrina recovery effort, where the government appears to have overpaid politically connected contractors. 

Back to Top


Implant Program For Heart Device Was a Sales Spur
Barry Meier

New York Times, September 26, 2005, Page A1

This article examines the practices of Guidant Corporation in marketing a heart implant that it manufactures. According to the company, the article paid doctors $1000 to use the device in their patients and monitor their progress. The article reports that the company devised this as a marketing strategy, which was apparently hugely successful in boosting sales. 

Back to Top


The Chinese Yuan

China Loosens Limits on Trading Against Other Currencies but Keeps Rein on Dollar
Keith Bradsher
New York Times, September 24, 2005, Page B6

This article reports on a change in China’s central bank policy under which it will supposedly allow its currency to fluctuate more against currencies other than the dollar, although it does not plan to change its link to the dollar. It really is not possible to maintain a rigid link to two floating currencies, which this article implies was the pre-existing policy. 

Suppose that the euro is equal to 1.25 dollars and that the exchange rates honored by the Chinese central bank are 8 yuan to the dollar and 10 yuan to the euro. Imagine the dollar then rose relative to the euro, so that
just 1.2 dollars were equal to the euro. If the Chinese central bank held its exchange rates constant, then it would be possible for someone to trade 1 euro for 10 yuan. At the official exchange rate, someone could buy 1.25 dollars with 10 yuan. That would mean that someone could still effectively exchange 1 euro for 1.25 dollars through China’s central bank, even though the market rate had fallen to 1.2 dollars to the euro.

While the yuan is not a freely traded currency, it would be very difficult to sustain an exchange rate between currencies that is substantially different from the market rate since the incentives to exploit these differences would be enormous. Therefore, China’s central bank really had little choice but to adopt the sort of policy described in this article, if it ever in fact had a different policy. 

Back to Top

Debt Relief

IMF, World Bank Advance Debt-Relief Pact
Paul Blustein
Washington Post, September 25, 2005, Page A11

This article reports on the debate over providing debt relief to a group of poor very heavily indebted countries. At one point the article notes the objection of the Netherlands, that allowing debt relief will reduce the resources of the World Bank, leaving it with less money to lend to poor countries. It is worth noting, that without debt relief, the additional money that the World Bank would receive would be coming entirely from the poorest countries in the world. In other words, according to the article, the Netherlands officials must be arguing that it is important for the poorest countries to provide money to the World Bank so that it would have more money to lend to poor countries.  


Back to Top


Energy Production and the Price of Oil

To Conserve Gas, President Calls for Less Driving
David Leonhardt, Jad Maouawad and David E. Sanger
New York Times, September 27, 2005, Page A1

This article discusses the country’s energy situation following the impact of hurricanes Katrina and Rita. At one point it presents a quote from John B. Walker, a representative of the Independent Petroleum Association of America, that drilling for oil and gas in protected areas will save consumers “upward of $500 billion.” 

It is worth noting that oil and natural gas are sold in a world market. New finds of oil and gas in the United States will only bring savings to consumers insofar as they reduce the world price of these products. In the case of oil, the projection for the peak yield from drilling in the Artic Wildlife Refuge (the major protected zone at present) is approximately 1 million barrels a day. This will be equal to just over 1 percent of the projected world supply in 10-15 years, the soonest that it could be brought on-line. An increase in supply of this magnitude would imply a reduction in oil prices of less than 3 percent for the 10 years or so that peak production could be sustained. 

The article does not include any evidence that Mr. Walker may have to support his contention, but it seems likely that the potential savings he claimed from increased oil and gas drilling considerably exceeds the range of plausible estimates. 

Back to Top

Housing Sales and Prices

Concerns Raised as Home Sales, Prices Rise Again
Nell Henderson
Washington Post, September 27, 2005, Page D1

Most Homeowners Not Overly in Debt, Fed Chief Says
Edmund L. Andrews
New York Times, September 27, 2005, Page C1

These articles both discuss the release of data on existing home sales in August. Both articles noted that the August sales figures were considerably higher than had generally been expected. It is worth noting that existing home sales are reported based on the date when a closing is registered. Typically, there is a gap of 6 to 8 weeks between the signing of a contract on a house and the closing on that contract. This means that the August sales data is providing more information about the state of the housing market in June and July than in August. 

The article by Henderson includes comments from David A. Lereah, the chief economist at the National Realtors Association. Mr. Lereah noted the extraordinary run-up in home prices in recent years, but argued that it is likely to continue due to population growth and tight housing inventories. 

While the U.S. population is growing, it is actually growing at a very slow rate, in fact, the slowest in the history of the country. This is the basis for the concern over the widely publicized Social Security shortfall. If the population were projected to continue to grow as fast as it had in prior decades, then the Social Security system would be fully solvent forever. 

The tightness of inventories is also hugely responsive to changes in demand. (Inventories are typically measured as the months of demand they will fill). If the demand for new or existing homes fell back to its mid-nineties levels, inventories would be at near record levels. 

New-Home Sales Fell 9.9% In August
Martin Crutzinger
Washington Post, September 28, 2005, Page D2

New Homes Sales Fall as Consumer Confidence Hits 2-Year Low
Vikas Bajaj
New York Times, September 28, 2005, Page C5

These articles report on a 9.9 percent reported decline in new homes sales in August. Both articles note that this was an extraordinarily large decline. 

It is worth noting that the August decline followed an unusually large rise of 5.3 percent in July. The July data were especially unusual since it showed that sales rose by 22.9 percent in the west. It is unlikely that there really was an increase of 22.9 percent in home sales in the west in July; most likely this was attributable to an error in reporting. In August, home sales in the west fell by 17.9 percent, bringing them almost exactly even with their June level. In short, there was probably no sharp rise in home sales in July and so sharp falloff in August, there was simply a fluke in reporting that caused the reported July sales to be much higher than actual sales in the month.

Back to Top


Greenspan on the Economy

Greenspan Credits Economy’s Flexibility
Nell Henderson
Washington Post, September 28, 2005, Page D3

This article reports on a speech by Alan Greenspan in which he argued that the United States economy is well prepared to deal with shocks because it is so flexible. He praised what he described as the lowering of trade barriers over the last two decades. Greenspan also touted the fact that the 2001 recession was the mildest recession since World War II.

It is actually not clear that the United States has on net reduced barriers to trade over the last two decades. It has substantially reduced trade barriers in manufactured goods, thereby putting manufacturing workers in direct competition with low paid workers in the developing world. However, it has substantially increased trade barriers in other areas, most notably by increasing the length and scope of patent and copyright protections. The United States has also maintained or increased the protections for highly paid professionals, like doctors and lawyers. 

In principle, the economic distortions that result from protecting these professionals would be far larger than the distortions from protecting a worker in manufacturing. Doctors in the United States earn an average of $200,000 a year (net of malpractice fees); this is approximately $100,000 more than doctors earn on average in west Europe. By comparison, a textile worker earns an average of $20,000 a year. While this is considerably more than what textile workers receive in developing counties, the gaps are not nearly as large as the gap between the pay of doctors in the United States and doctors in west Europe. 

Anyone who is actually concerned about the economic distortions created by trade barriers should be much more troubled by the distortions created by protections for doctors and other professionals than barriers to trade in manufactured goods. It is worth noting that protectionist barriers for highly paid professionals shift the distribution of income upward, whereas protectionist barriers for manufactured products would lead to a more equal distribution of income.

It is also worth noting that the recovery from the 2001 recession has been by far the weakest of the post-war period. While Mr. Greenspan is correct in saying the recession was milder than any prior post-war recession, because the recovery was so much weaker than any prior recovery, the country had its longest period of negative job growth since the great depression. The economy still has not gotten back to the same rates of employment that it had prior to the recession. In terms of its impact on the ability of workers to get jobs and secure higher wages, given the weakness of the subsequent recovery, the 2001 downturn was the most severe of the post-war period.    

Back to Top

The IMF and Protectionism

IMF Chief Pressured On Trade Imbalances
Paul Blustein
Washington Post, September 29, 2005, Page D1

This article reports on pressure being put on the IMF to play a more active role in resolving global trade imbalances. According to the article the Bush administration has been trying to get the IMF to pressure China to revalue its currency.

It is worth noting that if the Bush administration felt strongly that China’s currency should be revalued, it could effectively bring this about immediately by announcing that it would redeem the currency in dollars at a higher exchange rate than is being offered by the Chinese central bank. For example, the U.S. Treasury could announce that it will buy yuan at the rate of 6 to a dollar, compared to the official rate of 8 yuan to a dollar. If the Treasury committed itself to this policy, it would be very difficult for the Chinese government to maintain its exchange rate.

The article also reports that “many economists” fear that current trade imbalances could lead to a “protectionist backlash.” There seems very little concern among economists about protectionism in general, since they are rarely troubled by the protectionist barriers that sustain high salaries for doctors or lawyers, or patent and copyright protection that raise the price of protected items by several hundred percent above the competitive market price. The concern of economists seems to be focused exclusively on protectionist barriers that might improve the bargaining situation of workers at the middle and the bottom of the wage distribution.

The article also describes the managing director of the IMF as the “chief steward of the global economy.” The basis for this description is not clear. The IMF was originally established to support the system of fixed exchange rates put in place after World War II. In the last three decades it has acted primarily as the leader of a creditors’ cartel that has sought to ensure that the interests of creditors are fully protected when countries face financial crises. There is nothing in the IMF’s charter nor in its conduct that would suggest that its managing director has responsibility for maintaining the health of the global economy.

Back to Top

 Italy

A Normal Political Crisis in an Abnormal Country
Ian Fisher

New York Times
, September 29, 2005, Page A4

This article discusses the current political crisis in Italy. At one point it describes Italy’s current malaise and lists signs that include “an aging population.” Actually, the immediate causes of an aging population are better health care and higher living standards that allow people to live longer. Most economists consider these to be positive developments, not evidence of malaise. 

Back to Top


Dean Baker is Co-Director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington, D.C.