Economic Reporting Review
By Dean Baker
September 23, 2002
OUTSTANDING STORIES OF THE WEEK
CSFB Analyst Suggested Dodging New Industry Regulations
Ben White
Washington Post, September 14, 2002, Page E1
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A15073-2002Sep13.html
This article reports on evidence that Credit Suisse First Boston deliberately violated new rules by the Securities Industries
Association that prohibited stock analysts from making reports directly to investment bankers.
Analyze This: What Those Analysts Said in Private
Gretchen Morgenson
New York Times, September 15, 2002, Section 3 page 1
http://query.nytimes.com/search/abstract?res=FB0E12FE35550C768DDDA00894DA404482
This article reports on internal e-mails at Credit Suisse First Boston, which indicate that its
analysts had serious questions about the prospects for AOL-Time Warner. In spite of these
concerns, Credit Suisse continued to issue very positive reports on AOL, presumably to
maintain good relations with the company.
The Budget
For Bush, the Stump Goes On
Mike Allen
Washington Post, September 17, 2002, Page A4
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A26553-2002Sep16.html
This article reports on President Bush's trip to Iowa, during which he campaigned on behalf of
Representative Jim Nussle who is running for re-election. While the article reports that Bush
referred to Rep. Nussle as "the budget man in the House of Representatives," and that the topic
of the event was "Remarks on the Budget," it presents none of the substance of the president's
speech. The article provides no information whatsoever about what Bush actually said
about the budget.
Group May Estimate Effects of Tax Cuts
Richard W. Stevenson
New York Times, September 18, 2002, page A19
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/09/18/politics/18TAX.html
This article discusses the possibility that the Congressional Joint Committee on Taxation will
start using "dynamic scoring" to estimate the impact of tax cuts on the budget. The article
describes this methodology as an assessment "of whether proposed tax cuts will help the
economy and ultimately pay for themselves by generating more revenue for the government."
While it is plausible that tax cuts could increase economic growth, which would lead to
additional tax revenue, it is almost inconceivable that they would stimulate enough growth to pay
for themselves. For example, conventional estimates put the elasticity of the supply of labor at
between 0.1 and 0.2 percent. This means that a 10 percent increase in the after-tax wage
would lead to an increase in labor supply of between 1-2 percent. The tax cut approved last
year by Congress would have the effect of raising the after-tax wage by an average of
approximately 3 percent. This implies that labor supply would increase by between 0.3 and 0.6
percent, which would lead to a roughly equivalent increase in output. The government
collects approximately 20 percent of GDP in tax revenue, which means that this additional output could
be expected to generate an amount of additional tax revenue equal to approximately 0.15 to 0.3
percent of GDP. By comparison, the tax cut will cost the government an amount equal to
approximately 1.0 percent of projected GDP. It would be necessary to use completely
unrealistic assumptions about the responsiveness of the economy to tax cuts in order to
construct a scenario in which there was sufficient growth for the economy to pay
for itself.
It is also important to note that budget forecasters do not use "dynamic scoring" for any other
budget proposal. For example, it would be reasonable to argue that government expenditures
on research will lead to new inventions and thereby increase economic growth, which would
also generate more tax revenue. However, budget forecasters do not assume that research
expenditures will lead to additional growth, because of the difficulty in constructing accurate
estimates of the impact of research spending on growth. This is the same reason why the Joint
Committee, like all other official budget forecasters, has not used dynamic scoring for taxes.
The amount of error in any projection based on dynamic scoring would be very large
because the impacts are extremely hard to predict. While the article does note this criticism of the
dynamic scoring of tax cuts, the point could have been made more clearly.
Amid Talk of War Spending, Bush Urges Fiscal Restraint
Elisabeth Bumiller
New York Times, September 17, 2002, page A20
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/09/17/politics/17BUSH.html
This article reports on President Bush's insistence that Congress restrain spending, even as he is
proposing a war that his aides estimate could cost between $100-$200 billion. The article
notes that the immediate focus of Mr. Bush's concern was a $5.1 billion emergency spending
appropriation.
The article reports that Lawrence Lindsey, the President's chief economic advisor, downplayed
the importance of a one-time expenditure on a war. It is worth noting that the real
(inflation-adjusted) interest burden caused by the additional debt that would result from
the war would be $3-$6 billion annually, assuming a 3 percent real interest on government borrowing.
Germany
German Rival, In Hard Race, Raises Specter of Immigrants
Steven Erlanger
New York Times, September 17, 2002, page A10
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/09/17/international/europe/17GERM.html
This article reports on the elections that are scheduled in Germany on September 22nd . It
reports that the conservative party's candidate, Edmund Stoiber, is now trying to make
immigration an issue. At the end of the article it notes that Germany's population
is projected to decline by more than 20 percent over the next fifty years, and that this decline will make
immigration an important political topic.
There is no obvious problem created by a slowly declining population. In a relatively densely
populated country like Germany, a declining population can actually be seen as a positive
development, since it will reduce crowding and pollution. According to the numbers
presented in the article, the projected decline in the ratio of workers to population (due to aging) is just 4
percentage points over the next fifty years. If productivity grows 2.0 percent annually
(roughly the average of the last twenty years), the impact on workers' living standards of this reduction in
the ratio of workers to retirees, can be offset with just 5 percent of the country's
normal productivity growth.
Rewards and Innovations
Rebel Wants Japan's Inventors To Get Some U.S.-Style Rewards
John Markoff
New York Times, September 18, 2002, page C1
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/09/18/technology/18INVE.html
Japan Court Says Company, Not Inventor, Controls Patent
Ken Belson
New York Times, September 20, 2002, page W1
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/09/20/technology/20INVE.html
These articles report on the lawsuit brought by an engineer against a Japanese chemical
company. According to the articles, he has sued the company because it is marketing inventions
that he developed while he was employed there, without paying him royalties.
The articles imply that the engineer has been treated unfairly by the company. For example, the
second article describes Japanese companies as "notoriously stingy when it comes to paying
employees for a share of their inventions." It is worth noting that Japan has one of the highest
rates of patents per capita in the world. This suggests that the Japanese system is very effective
in developing new technologies as it is currently structured. While society has a major interest in
promoting innovation, it has no obvious interest in ensuring that innovators become rich. These
articles seem to imply that it should.
The Economy
Industrial Production Falls For First Time in Eight Months
Associated Press
New York Times, September 18, 2002, page C7
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/09/18/business/18ECON.html
This article reports on new data from the Federal Reserve Board showing that industrial
production fell in August. At one point it reports that "economists remain optimistic" that the
economy will not fall back into a recession, in large part because consumer spending continues
to remain strong. It is worth noting that the vast majority of economists never expected the
economy to sink into a recession in the first place; their ability to predict recessions is
very poor.
It is also worth noting that consumer spending is remaining strong because consumers are
borrowing at record rates. The current pace of borrowing cannot be sustained indefinitely. In
particular, borrowing against home equity, which grew at an annual rate of $650 billion in the
second quarter, is likely to slow soon as more and more families reach the limit of their
borrowing capacity.
Fed Signals Point to No Rate Shift
John M. Berry
Washington Post, September 20, 2002, Page E1
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A41743-2002Sep19.html
This article evaluates the likelihood that the Federal Reserve Board will lower interest rates at its
meeting next week. At one point, the article reports the views of "many forecasters" that
the recovery is continuing, albeit in an uneven pace. The vast majority of forecasters did not
anticipate last year's recession, so their views must be treated with caution.
The article also notes that unemployment claims have jumped above 400,000 in the last two
weeks. Prior articles reported that Federal Reserve Board Chairman Alan Greenspan considers
unemployment claims an important leading indicator of an economic downturn (e.g. "Fed Shows
No Sign of Another Rate Cut," by John M. Berry, Washington Post, July 25, 2002, Page E1).
The article also reports that the trade deficit was recorded as declining in July from the levels
reported in June. It quotes an economist who described this decline as "startling." Prior articles
had reported that the June trade deficit was likely inflated by the fact that importers were
rushing to bring in goods ahead of a possible strike by longshoremen on the west coast (e.g.
"U.S. Growth Sluggish in 2nd Quarter," by John M. Berry, Washington Post, August
1, 2002, Page E1; and "New Report Shows U.S. Economy Slowed Significantly for Quarter," David
Leonhardt, New York Times, August 1, 2002, Page C1). If this explanation of the June rise in
the trade deficit was accurate, then the July decline should have been expected.
Campaign Ads
Hearing 'Foul,' Stations Pull Political Ads
Howard Kurtz
Washington Post, September 20, 2002, Page A14
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A41262-2002Sep19.html
This article discusses efforts by candidates to prevent the airing of ads by opponents, which
they claim are untrue. The article presents several examples of ads that stations have stopped
running because of such objections. It does not make any effort to assess whether the claims
are in fact true.
In some cases, this could have been quite easily done. For example, one ad accused Jill Long, a
Democratic running to regain a House seat, of having "voted seven times to raid the Social
Security trust fund." There has never been a congressional vote on raiding the Social Security
trust fund. This would mean a vote on defaulting on the government bonds held by the trust
fund. Many politicians have used the words "raiding the Social Security Trust Fund" to refer to
spending the money which is borrowed from the trust fund, but under current law this has no
effect whatsoever on the Social Security program or its financing. It would have been helpful to
make such information available to readers.
The Housing Market
Housing 'Bubble' May Not Exist, but the Market Could Still Teeter
Daniela Deane and Neil Irwin
Washington Post, September 20, 2002, Page E1
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A41625-2002Sep19.html
This article assesses whether the nation and the Washington metropolitan area are experiencing
a housing bubble. At several points it refers to facts that there does not appear to be an excess
supply of houses for sale on the market as evidence that there is no housing bubble.
It is important to note that this can change very quickly, depending on the psychology of current
and prospective homeowners. While there was no excess supply of Internet stocks as long as
investors expected them to rise in value, there quickly became a huge excess supply when
investors became concerned about profits. In the case of the housing market, the supply could
surge quickly if people who are currently considering a move in the next few years rush to
sell now because they are worried that home prices will fall.
It is also worth noting that the vacancy rate for rental housing is at near record levels. This is
likely to put downward pressure on home sale prices, both because renting can offer a lower-
cost option, and because rental housing can be converted into owner- occupied housing.
The article fails to note that the rise in home prices, (30 percentage points above the rate of
inflation over the last seven years), is without any precedent in the post-war period. Without this
basis of comparison it is impossible to determine whether such a run- up is normal or
extraordinary. It also neglects to mention the national demographics which point to reduced
demand for housing - the children of most baby boomers have moved out recently or will in the
near future, which will lead to lower demand for housing from the baby boomers. (This neglect
is striking since the projected budgetary costs of the baby boomers' retirement have been
discussed at enormous length.)
The article also seriously misrepresents a key statistic. It reports that the Bureau of Labor
Statistics "annual survey of consumer spending" (presumably the consumer expenditure survey),
showed that the share of after-tax income spent on housing fell from 30.9 percent in 1995 to
29.6 percent in 2000. This expenditure refers to spending on rent or rental equivalence in the
case of owner- occupied housing. If the sale price of homes (and mortgage payments)
outstrips the increase in rental prices, as it has over the last seven years, then it will not be reflected in this
measure.
Finally, the article lists a number of conditions, including low interest rates, which it says must be
maintained to keep home prices high. It asserts these conditions are likely to be met "in the
view of most who study such issues." The current interest rate on ten- year government bonds is 3.78
percent. Last month the Congressional Budget Office projected that the interest rate on
ten-year bonds would average 5.4 percent in 2003 and 5.8 percent for the rest of the
decade.
Africa
In Quietly Courting Africa, White House Likes Dowry: Oil
James Dao
New York Times, September 19, 2002, page A1
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/09/19/international/africa/19AFRI.html
This article reports on efforts by the Bush administration to strengthen ties with African nations,
which it hopes will result in increased oil imports from the region. At one point it comments
that, "during the 1990's, the Clinton administration tried to increase trade and investment in Africa,
while promoting efforts to fight AIDS." The latter assertion is questionable. The Clinton
administration pushed through the TRIPS provisions of the WTO, which makes it more difficult
for African nations to get access to AIDS medicines. It also threatened South Africa with trade
sanctions when it planned to provide generic drugs to AIDS victims. (It backed away
from this position after AIDS activists protested at several Gore campaign appearances.)
Trade
Consumer Prices Post 0.3% Rise, But U.S. Trade Deficit Narrows
Associated Press
New York Times, September 19, 2002, page C8
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/09/19/business/19ECON.html
This article reports on the decline in the trade deficit reported for July. This news takes up seven
paragraphs of a wire service story in the middle of the business section. The news on the
trade deficit was covered in one sentence in the "Business in Brief" section in the Washington Post.
At present, the trade deficit is leading the United States to borrow nearly $500 billion annually
from abroad. The economic consequences of this borrowing are approximately equivalent to a
budget deficit of the same magnitude. The (much smaller) budget deficit has been frequently
discussed in great detail in major front- page stories. The difference in the attention given to
these two issues cannot be justified on the basis of their significance for the economy or
people's lives.