Are They Allowed to Talk About Alternatives to Copyright at the NYT?
|
|
|
Saturday, 07 August 2010 08:08 |
|
Apparently not. A lengthy magazine piece that discussed the music industry's costly efforts to track down restaurants and bars that play copyrighted music without authorization never mentioned the possibility that there could be alternative mechanisms for financing music in the Internet Age. Instead, it held out the hope that new technology may allow the industry to monitor every radio, computer, and cell phone so that Time Warner would know every time one of its copyrighted songs was being played.
(Only one link allowed per comment)
 |
We have video of one your customers tapping his foot to the music while looking at your T-shirts. We'll have to charge you a per look per T-shirt charge, as well as a per purchase charge for each T-shirt.
However, we won't pay you for encouraging further purchases of the same music, nor will we pay those customers who don't like the music a penalty fee for being forced to listen to it.
We're sure you understand. If we can't extract from you every single monetizable incidence, then there won't be any music. Do you play the boom box in the bathroom too? Be sure to close the door and turn it down, because if someone besides you hears it, we'll have to charge you a per crap and pee charge as well.