CEPR - Center for Economic and Policy Research


En Español

Em Português

Other Languages

Home Publications Blogs Beat the Press Are World Financial Markets Talking to the NYT?

Are World Financial Markets Talking to the NYT?

Friday, 23 November 2012 12:43

If they are, the paper should charge more for its subscriptions. Come on folks, a sentence that tells readers:

"once the target numbers are settled, negotiators would have to come up with a down payment on deficit reduction to show the world’s financial markets that Washington is serious."

has no place in a serious newspaper. Someone obviously told the NYT reporter that it was necessary to have a "down payment" to convince world financial markets that "Washington is serious." The NYT did not get this tidbit from the financial markets themselves. We want names; who said this? How often has this person (persons) been completely wrong in their assessment of the economy over the last 5 years?

In the same vein, can we leave the philosophical discussions out of the budget reporting, as when the NYT tells us:

"arguments over the fallback [the default budget provisions if a second round of negotiations scheduled for 2013 fails to reach an agreement] reflect a philosophical divide."

Where does philosophy fit into this picture? We are talking budget negotiating strategies by politicians. Are we next going to hear that this involves competing recipes for preparing duck?

The piece also makes two major substantive errors. It reports on a plan to phase out the lower tax brackets for high income people, the article quotes "one aide familiar with the idea" as saying:

"It would not impact the top marginal rate, and no one would have an effective rate over 35 percent.”

Actually, some people would face a marginal tax rate above 35 percent as the phase out of the lower tax rates would push the effective rate in the zone of the phase out above 35 percent. Of course, very wealthy people whose income pushed them above the phase out zone would only see a marginal tax rate of 35 percent.

Finally, the piece begins by saying:

"Congressional negotiators, trying to avert a fiscal crisis in January..."

Congressional negotiators are not worried about a fiscal crisis in January. They are worried about an economic downturn that would result if a deal is not reached to prevent scheduled tax increases and spending cuts from taking effect. There is no fiscal crisis in this picture.

Comments (2)Add Comment
Can't you enjoy life...
written by Nassim Sabba, November 23, 2012 1:41
I don't know if you are subscribe to NYTimes. They have to make money somehow with free loaders like me who limit themselves to 11 articles per month.

A freak show is a lucrative enterprise. People come to see freaks. It doesn't mean they want to be one or they would take the freak's medical diagnosis seriously.

Although some kids may be scared of the freak, but grown ups don't complain.

Anyone who has the intelligence to get to the Times on the net or at a newsstand, probably laughs at the anonymous freak. So, enjoy the show.

If people can't understand the agenda of the "pay down the debt" crowd, then they would not understand it even if it was told to them point blank. The freak is here to scare you into buying guns and ammo to protect yourself. Few people would take that seriously.

The NYT, WAPO, and other rags are trying to get in on the comedy bandwagon that makes money. Be charitable.

I don't want names, I want what the freak smokes before NYT drags dark poetry out of him, or her.
It's too much to ignore
written by Anonymous, November 24, 2012 8:37
To the contrary, many people take what the New York Times and Washington Post say seriously. These papers are still regarded as great sources of news by most people. I can't tell you the number of students I've seen readings the Times and thinking they were getting sophisticated news. Additionally, "scaring people" who don't actually understand economic issues appears to be effective, as evidenced by the hysteria over the "fiscal cliff."

Write comment

(Only one link allowed per comment)

This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comments.


Support this blog, donate
Combined Federal Campaign #79613

About Beat the Press

Dean Baker is co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington, D.C. He is the author of several books, his latest being The End of Loser Liberalism: Making Markets Progressive. Read more about Dean.