CEPR - Center for Economic and Policy Research

Multimedia

En Español

Em Português

Other Languages

Home Publications Blogs Beat the Press Globalization Doesn't Just Happen

Globalization Doesn't Just Happen

Print
Wednesday, 22 August 2012 07:11

David Leonhardt's latest blog post on increasing inequality is a discussion of globalization. It's most reasonable except the underlying premise appears to be that globalization is something that just happened.

While this is a common theme in polite circles, it is ridiculous on its phase. Globalization has been by design. Ever hear of the WTO, NAFTA, CAFTA etc.? These are carefully hammered out deals that determine which sectors will exposed to more competition, which sectors will see increased protection (e.g. pharmaceuticals and Disney), and which sectors will largely be left alone.

It is not an accident that autoworkers and custodians have to face competition from people willing to work for very low wages from developing countries whereas doctors and lawyers are largely protected from this competition. This was by design. If the folks negotiating trade deals had put the same effort to open up competition in the currently high-paid professions as they did in manufactured goods, we would probably be paying our doctors $100k a year or less. And we would be saving hundreds of billions of dollars a year in health care costs, legal fees and other areas.

But, our trade negotiators were not trying to bring about economic gains at the expense of doctors and lawyers. These are people with whom they identify. They are also people who make large campaign contributions and who have friends and relatives who write news stories in major media outlets. So free trade in professional services was never a topic for trade negotiators. They remain largely protected from international competition and the people who write on economics pretend not to notice.

Comments (2)Add Comment
.Not "phase," it's face, it's "ridiculous on its FACE"
written by redQueen, August 22, 2012 1:26
Otherwise, exellent.
...
written by urban legend, August 22, 2012 4:19
Medicine is one thing, but I think including lawyers in this analysis is wrong. Compensation in the legal profession is bi-(or perhaps tri)furcated: Extremely well-compensated Big Law, solidly middle-class compensation for in-house lawyers in big corporations, and almost lower-middle class for many in tiny or one-person practices. The monumental fees that major firms command has little if anything to do with too little competition. It probably has similar origins to skyrocketing executive compensation: it's an inside job.

Law schools are churning out many more lawyers than we need. Law school curricula are virtually identical. There are many, many firms and lawyers who could perform the same substantive work with equal competence to the big firms at much lower fees, but they don't get the work. Even ignoring state licensing issues, international competition probably wouldn't change that.

Write comment

(Only one link allowed per comment)

This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comments.

busy
 

CEPR.net
Support this blog, donate
Combined Federal Campaign #79613

About Beat the Press

Dean Baker is co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington, D.C. He is the author of several books, his latest being The End of Loser Liberalism: Making Markets Progressive. Read more about Dean.

Archives