Oil Prices: Which Way Is Up?
|
|
|
Sunday, 08 August 2010 07:45 |
|
The NYT has a very good piece on the Minerals Management Service and the culture at the agency that led to a disregard of safety and environmental concerns. However, it gets an important point dead wrong at the very beginning. It begins by discussing a lease auction held in March of 1997 and tells readers that this was a period of rising oil prices.
That's not what the data show. Oil prices had been weak throughout the 90s and were headed down in March of 1997. At that point, in inflation-adjusted dollars, oil prices were near their lowest level of the post-war period. This can be seen as a secondary issue in terms of the article's main focus, but it is important to recognize that the world was not suffering from anything resembling an oil shortage at the time that that the government began this renewed push to open the Gulf to drilling.
(Only one link allowed per comment)
 |
This parallels the complacent attitude of mainstream economists on the volatility of the economy during the Great Moderation from the mid-'80s to mid-'00s, claiming that business cycles and corresponding downsides of recession had been tamed for good, like serious oil spills.
Systemic risks of entire systems and networks have started to dominate more common individual random risks, mimicking even the risk of terrorism, in terms of high-risk, low-incidence events, except that the incidence is picking up speed across separate systems and networks.
In regard to the low oil prices in '97, Baker's point seems to be the usual one, that as global price takers, high prices need not drive incentives to drill in the Gulf and indeed, lower prices provide even more motivation to reduce costs more by incurring higher environmental risk.