CEPR - Center for Economic and Policy Research

Multimedia

En Español

Em Português

Other Languages

Home Publications Blogs Beat the Press Teaching Economics to the Post on JP Morgan

Teaching Economics to the Post on JP Morgan

Print
Thursday, 24 October 2013 04:58

The Washington Post continues to be very upset that the government is spending time going after Wall Street banks. Its editorial today complained again about the Justice Department's lawsuit against JP Morgan.

Among other things, the piece complained that the homeowners who benefit from write-downs of mortgages ($4 billion of the $13 billion settlement) were not the victims of the bank's misrepresentations of mortgages sold in mortgage backed securities. It also argued that these write-downs could hurt the investors who were the victims of this misrepresentation.

Both parts of this story are not accurate. The misrepresentations were part of the wave of bad financing that pushed up house prices. As a result, many homebuyers bought homes at bubble inflated prices, paying far more than fundamentals of the market would dictate. On the other side, write-downs will often be in the interest of investors, since banks are virtually guaranteed to lose money on homes that go through the foreclosure process, which will happen with many underwater homes.

The piece is also wrong in complaining that this sort of suit does nothing to prevent future bubbles. It does provide some sanction against banks that were breaking the law in issuing and reselling fraudulent mortgages in their exuberance over the bubble. The lesson for banks in the future should be to follow the law. Of course criminal sanctions, with bank executives facing prison time, would be far more effective in accomplishing this goal.

Also, if we want to prevent bubbles in the future, it would be desirable to have intelligent life at the Fed. It would be good to have a chair and governors who were prepared to use the Fed's weight to counter the impact of a bubble, rather than cheer it on as Alan Greenspan did. This would mean documenting the fact that prices were out of line with fundamentals with Fed research and using its bully pulpit to publicize this research so that even the Washington Post editorial board would know about it.

The Fed could also use its substantial regulatory power to crack down on the abuses in the mortgage industry that were quite evident at the time (except to Alan Greenspan). And, it could convene meetings with other federal and state regulators to pressure them to similarly crack down on the abuses at the financial institutions under their jurisdiction.

The failure to pursue criminal actions against bank executives, and the continuing treatment of Alan Greenspan as a great authority on the economy, should raise concerns about the extent to which we are prepared to counter future bubbles.

Comments (7)Add Comment
Shareholders Will Sue to Recoup Fraud Losses
written by robertsalzberg, October 24, 2013 6:36
Before the ink is dry on the final settlement, you can be sure that attorneys around the country will begin recruiting shareholders for class action lawsuits due to the systemic fraud at J P Morgan. Expect television commercials before Thanksgiving...

The shareholders will also get a large settlement which in effect will increase their slice of the profit pie.
...
written by kharris, October 24, 2013 9:49
There has been a persistent effort over decades to make government a handmaiden to business. That is not the only way to go. Government as referee has reason to operate in an adversarial role. We are not allowed to see things that way. It's been made taboo. Society would probably be better off if government were to be more adversarial with business.
The sad part about state regulation is
written by EMIchael, October 24, 2013 10:26
that the OCC stopped all state regulation of national banks.

So not only did the OCC fail in its regulatory mission(along with the Fed), it stopped the states from doing so.
cracking down on fraud..., Low-rated comment [Show]
trolls
written by Peter K., October 24, 2013 11:47
Keep fighting the good fight, Pete. I'm sure you'll be rewarded in the afterlife.

The media's treatment of the Tea Party and Greenspan is depressing until you consider that it has always been this way. That's a large part of the problem.
...
written by nineteen50, October 24, 2013 4:29
Then let the Washington Post pay for the defense lawyers and pay the judgement if there be one. Once again brave from beyond range.
...
written by heylair, October 25, 2013 2:54
Little Pete's fictional account of the crisis is typical right-wing drivel. The poor and blue collar workers didn't cause the crisis. Nice try.

Write comment

(Only one link allowed per comment)

This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comments.

busy
 

CEPR.net
Support this blog, donate
Combined Federal Campaign #79613

About Beat the Press

Dean Baker is co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington, D.C. He is the author of several books, his latest being The End of Loser Liberalism: Making Markets Progressive. Read more about Dean.

Archives