The $28,000 Prescription: Drug Companies Run Wild
|
|
|
Sunday, 30 December 2012 15:07 |
|
The NYT had a fascinating piece on how Questcor raised the price of its drug Acthar to $28,000 per prescription. Since it raised its price it has begun pushing the drug for a number of uses for which it may not be suited. It is able to do this because the drug was initially approved by the FDA in 1952, before restrictions on off-label marketing applied.
Until recently the drug sold for less than $2,000 per prescription. (Apparently, the manufacturing process is complicated and expensive.) At this price the drug company had little incentive to try to promote its drug for different uses. It is only the high price which provides the incentive for mis-marketing the drug.
(Only one link allowed per comment)
 |
But Questcor did almost no research or development to bring Acthar to market, merely buying the rights to the drug from its previous owner for $100,000 in 2001. And while the manufacturing of Acthar is complex, it accounts for only about 1 cent of every dollar that Questcor charges for the drug.
When I saw this quote I was curious (it seemed to be the only positive MD quote in regards to the company)--
Dr. Lawrence Brown, a neurologist at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and the president of the Child Neurology Foundation, says of Questcor: “They have gone out of their way to help every kid who needs the medicine to get it quickly and efficiently.”
Guess who part of the corporate advisory board of Child Neurology Foundation--that's right Questcor! I should emphasize this is a feature, not a bug. It would have been nice for the NYT to have pointed this out. One thing brought out by this article is the way insurance companies could play a positive role in health care reform. In part it was the large sticker price that caused insurance companies to question the drug and has caused a entire MD rethink, it is not clear it is terribly effective anyway.