CEPR - Center for Economic and Policy Research

Multimedia

En Español

Em Português

Other Languages

Home Publications Blogs Beat the Press The NYT Wrongly Asserts That Economists Want to Cut Social Security

The NYT Wrongly Asserts That Economists Want to Cut Social Security

Print
Sunday, 31 July 2011 14:06

The NYT is starting to do the same sort of editorializing in news stories for which Fox and the Washington Post are famous. It told readers that President Obama had proposed a change in the Social Security cost of living adjustment formula that would reduce scheduled benefits and then adds that this cut was "long sought by economists."

Umm, which economists? All economists? Not this one, or many others with whom I associate. Is there a poll of economists that provides the basis for this assertion? If so, a cite would be in order.

Actually many people, including economists, have suggested that if the point is to have a cost of living adjustment that accurately reflects the cost of living of Social Security beneficiaries then the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) can construct a full cost of living index for people over the age of 65 (or 62). It already has an experimental elderly index, which shows a higher rate of inflation than the index that is currently used for cost of living adjustments.

Economists, and others, who want to see an accurate cost of living adjustment would advocate having the BLS construct a full cost of living index for the elderly. Economists, and others, who want to see Social Security benefits reduced advocate adopting an index that shows a lower rate of inflation, whether or not this accurately represents the cost of living of Social Security beneficiaries.

Comments (7)Add Comment
Who reads the New York Times?
written by Scott ffolliott, July 31, 2011 6:03
The Newspeak Times has kept us in the dark with its toadyism for far too long.
And please don't bring up the Pentagon Papers that liberal canard.

What’s Left in the U S of A?
...
written by bailey, August 01, 2011 9:14
Boskin Commission redux? There's plenty of evidence to suggest few Economists will speak against this sure to be enacted travesty.
??
written by UGG Bailey Button Bomber, August 10, 2011 7:04
it would be a logical next step to install the Down
Adizero Rose 2.0
written by Adizero Rose 2.0, August 10, 2011 7:06
I will cover just a few of them here. The ones I will cover fall into three
puma shoes 2011
written by puma shoes 2011, August 10, 2011 7:10
The next mods, are the true twin conversion mods (or TTC).
Cheap Nike Air Max 87 Shoes
written by Cheap Nike Air Max 87 Shoes, August 10, 2011 7:11
The "BPU(TM)" term is used until you have an upgraded turbo(s).
http://www.authenticshoe.com/a...c-416.html
written by adidas training shoes, August 10, 2011 7:11
If you added cam gears to that, it would be BPU(TM)++, and so on.

Write comment

(Only one link allowed per comment)

This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comments.

busy
 

CEPR.net
Support this blog, donate
Combined Federal Campaign #79613

About Beat the Press

Dean Baker is co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington, D.C. He is the author of several books, his latest being The End of Loser Liberalism: Making Markets Progressive. Read more about Dean.

Archives