CEPR - Center for Economic and Policy Research
Publications

Multimedia

COLUMNS

Mark Weisbrot,
Co-Director


Dean Baker,
Co-Director

Home Publications Blogs Beat the Press USA Today and Marketing Scams on Household Income Measure

USA Today and Marketing Scams on Household Income Measure

Print
Friday, 10 February 2012 11:08

Short-term measures of real family income are driven primarily by sampling error and erratic movements in the consumer price index. The latter is mostly due to fluctuations in energy prices.

This is the reason that most economists, unlike USA Today, would not take seriously a report showing a large gain in median family income in the last four months of 2011. The main reason for the sharp rise in income shown in this report is likely the sharp drop in the consumer price index over this period.

It is more useful to report these data over longer periods of time so that random fluctuations play less of a role. Given the vast amount of material that is available for free on the web, it is especially difficult to understand why USA Today would place so much emphasis on a newly produced report that is being sold for $20 each.

Comments (5)Add Comment
USA Today Worthy?
written by James, February 10, 2012 11:00 AM

of your time to review and actually comment? It's a self-proclaimed national paper with colorful graph and high-level snap shots for people who are waiting to check out hotels or pass the TSA lines.

Other than that, the paper and its Board are as informed (or almost) as National Enquirer.

USA Today
written by Rob Lewis, February 10, 2012 11:24 AM
It's what a newspaper would be if it was a comic book.
Another Green Shoot Sliced Off at the Root By Grim Reaper Baker
written by izzatzo, February 10, 2012 11:43 AM
Stupid liberals.
Excellent point!
written by Luke Lea, February 10, 2012 12:05 PM
This is why we pay you.
It would be funny, if.....
written by T.M.Godett, February 11, 2012 3:26 AM
Your assessment of the USA Today treatment of this report is spot on, but are you surprised? It is merely another demonstration of the sorry state of journalism, or rather what is being passed off to the public as journalism. What you suggest would take real work and that's wholly unnecessary in today's environment and might even violate the objectives of the publisher. The sad part is how many people rely on USA Today for news and consider it a legitimate source. Same for WAPO and too often, the NYT. Where are the "Woodsteins" of today?

Write comment

(Only one link allowed per comment)

This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comments.

busy
 

Support this blog, donate
pledge-to-beat-the-press-sm

About Beat the Press

Dean Baker is co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington, D.C. He is the author of several books, his latest being The End of Loser Liberalism: Making Markets Progressive. Read more about Dean.

Archives