CEPR - Center for Economic and Policy Research
Publications

Multimedia

COLUMNS

Mark Weisbrot,
Co-Director


Dean Baker,
Co-Director

Home Publications Blogs Beat the Press Why Do Trade Agreements Have to be "Free?"

Why Do Trade Agreements Have to be "Free?"

Print
Tuesday, 04 October 2011 05:13

Why can't the NYT just call the trade agreements being sent to the senate "trade" agreements? Why does it feel the need to mislead readers in the headline and several times in the article itself by calling them "free trade" agreements?

These deals do not free all trade. There will still be plenty of protectionist barriers left in place that will make it difficult for doctors, lawyers and other professionals from these countries from working in the United States. Furthermore the deals actually increase protectionism in the areas of patents and copyrights, which is one of their main purposes.

Presumably the NYT approves of these deals which is why it blesses them as "free trade" agreements, but this sort of editorializing should be left to the opinion pages.

Comments (8)Add Comment
Nafta
written by jesse, October 04, 2011 6:37 PM
Even NAFTA still has restrictions on personal exemptions, so the trade is only really "free" insofar as it supports existing supply chain jobs at home.
No Free Lunch
written by deanx, October 05, 2011 6:06 AM
Use of the word Free also implies you don't have to give anything up for the deal, like your job.
Hmmm...
written by dick c, October 05, 2011 10:28 AM
Maybe "New and Improved" wasn't polling well with the focus groups.
An intersting question to consider.
written by Joe Emersberger, October 05, 2011 10:55 AM
To what extent is there "free trade" within countries like the US and does it "work"?

To the extent that there is free trade within the United States, a crucial compenent of it is free movement of workers within the country.

International trade agreements (falsely labelled "free trade" as Dean says) do not incorporate free movement of workers across borders - quite the contrary. In fact, so called "free trade" champions also support laws that severely punish workers for trying to move across international borders in pursuit of a better living.

In the UNited States, in addition to free movement across state lines, workers also have a federal government they can (to minimal extent unfortunately) pressure to look after their interests.

No such federal governmnet exists at the international level that workers can pressure.

...
written by S. D. Jeffries, October 05, 2011 12:58 PM
Free or Unfree, trade agreements are not going to help the American worker until the U.S. manages to restructure its economy to make it possible for workers to find jobs in an emerging service economy. Manufacturing is not returning to this country with the strength it would take to put the millions of unemployed back to work, and right now the "leaders" of the country - neither political nor labor - have any idea how to prepare and transition the workforce into the future.
"have any idea how to prepare and transition the workforce into the future"
written by diesel, October 05, 2011 3:21 PM
To die for one's country is the greatest sacrifice an individual can be called upon to make.

To shine a bright light upon the nobility of those unemployable working class people who opt for this way out of their situation while at the same time relieving society of the noxious burden of supporting them, the Tea Party is issuing a genuine gold-plated "Freedom Medal" bearing the likeness of the Beloved Leader, Ronald Reagan, that will forever commemorate their magnanimous offering up of their "last full measure of devotion". Special "Freedom" trains await to transport the useless to their rendezvous with destiny where they will imbibe a purple sugary liquid concoction called Jesus Juice, which, being the blood of the lamb, will numb their bodies and elevate their minds to a state of hyper ecstasy in preparation for the ritual that awaits them.

God Bless our exceptional country, where the rules that govern other nations don't apply. We are quite simply, above them.
Bless you, bless you, bless you
written by El Cid, October 07, 2011 4:48 PM
There are no such things as "free" trade agreements.

There are simply different trade agreements with different winners and different losers.

And so forth.

Thank you for helping people to understand this.
Unemployed
written by Robert Palm, October 09, 2011 11:50 AM
Use of the word free is actually counter productive to the establishment. Free develops hostility to trade in a public that does not support it any more. I always sneer when I pronounce free in the phrase free trade.

It is like Fox News describing itself as fair and balanced.

Write comment

(Only one link allowed per comment)

This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comments.

busy
 

Support this blog, donate
pledge-to-beat-the-press-sm

About Beat the Press

Dean Baker is co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington, D.C. He is the author of several books, his latest being The End of Loser Liberalism: Making Markets Progressive. Read more about Dean.

Archives