CEPR - Center for Economic and Policy Research


En Español

Em Português

Other Languages

Home Publications Blogs CEPR Blog A Different Kind of Stimulus

A Different Kind of Stimulus

Written by Franklin Serrano   
Tuesday, 14 June 2011 15:36

Famous conservative economist Milton Friedman used to compare an expansionary monetary policy to the government (the Fed in this case) dropping dollar bills from a helicopter. As it is well known, that led many to call Ben Bernanke "Helicopter Ben" because of the large increase in the monetary base that he has presided over to prevent a more serious credit crunch and to save the big banks from themselves.

Nowadays many analysts, including Mr. Larry Summers, think that not much more can be achieved with expansionary monetary policy. The U.S. economy is badly in need of a new fiscal stimulus. There is a great economic, political and ideological debate over whether a new stimulus would be necessary, efficient and/or politically acceptable in the present circumstances.

Many conservatives are very much against a new stimulus, almost as much as they one day were in favor of the second war against Iraq. Perhaps it would be easier to convince them to support a new stimulus by reminding them of a little-known but quite interesting fiscal stimulus operation that happened during the Bush Administration.

It appears that during May 2004 the U.S. government sent to Iraq military cargo planes full of U.S. dollars in cash to help with the "recovery" of the Iraqi economy. It is reported that 21 flights of Hercules C-130 planes full of 100-dollar bills took place. The amount of the "stimulus" appears to have been something like 12 billion dollars. The money was distributed widely among U.S. "contractors" and Iraqi ministries. It seems also that of that money, about 6.6 billion dollars has vanished without a trace and remains unaccounted for even today.

Now that must have made the operation particularly stimulating, especially for American "contractors." It seems that it is time to relive this operation. Bring on the C-130 planes. Forget "Helicopter Ben." What we need now is "Hercules Geithner."

Comments (1)Add Comment
A Jubilee Year, not Hercules Geithner
written by Elwood Anderson, June 14, 2011 4:48
In times past, the controlling elites used to have a Jubilee Year where all debt were forgiven and the economy started over. The controlling elites are now the banks, hedge funds, other funds and their shareholders. It's not very likely they're going to sponsor a Jubilee Year. Government should give the "too big to fail" banks a choice: 1) Be broken up into "not too big to fail" banks, or 2) Mark you liar loans to market and take a haircut on them. The problem we have is that the amount of money available to create demand and job growth is depressed by the need to service debt. Get rid of the debt and we'll be on our way to recovery. Banks and other financial corporation are flush with cash, due to having access to free money for nearly a decade. They can afford to take a hit. Raising interest rates on savings accounts under the FDIC limit would put money into the hands of seniors and savers that would spend it, not sit on it, creating demand. If the banks won't do it, the government should do it. They're guaranteeing the accounts anyway. That would be a start.

Write comment

(Only one link allowed per comment)

This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comments.


Support this blog, donate
Combined Federal Campaign #79613
budget economy education employment Haiti health care housing inequality jobs labor labor market minimum wage paid family leave poverty recession retirement Social Security taxes unemployment unions wages Wall Street women workers working class

+ All tags