CEPR - Center for Economic and Policy Research


En Español

Em Português

Other Languages

Home Publications Blogs CEPR Blog Dodd-Frank and Subprime Auto Loan Market

Dodd-Frank and Subprime Auto Loan Market

Written by Dean Baker   
Monday, 21 July 2014 13:18

Four years out from the passage of Dodd-Frank it is pretty clear that the bill did not lead to an fundamental restructuring of our financial system, as many had hoped. The too-big-too-fail Wall Street banks are bigger than ever and operating pretty much as they always did. Many of the highest earners in the country are still traders, hedge fund, and private equity types who are quite adept at shuffling paper, even if it provides no service to the productive economy.

There is one important gain that can be identified from Dodd-Frank: the creation of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). The importance of the CFPB was demonstrated clearly last weekend in a New York Times article on abuses in the subprime auto loan market.

The article documented practices that were reminiscent of the abuses of the housing bubble years. Lenders were filling in phony income numbers to allow borrowers to get loans for which they would not otherwise qualify. They would list higher interest rates and sometimes a higher loan amount that what had been agreed to with the borrower. They would also tack on fees and charges that had not been clearly disclosed. The result is that many borrowers end up losing their cars and also end up with a big strike on their credit record.  

These abuses testify to the importance of the CFPB because they are occurring in the one major area of consumer lending explicitly excluded from the CFPB. Auto loans were stripped out of the CFPB's jurisdiction by an amendment proposed by Representative John Campbell (R-CA), a former used car dealer. The amendment passed with several Democrats joining the Republicans to secure a majority.

The striking part of this picture is that the abuses are occurring where the CFPB is not operating, as opposed to the sectors of the consumer market where it does have jurisdiction. This demonstrates both that the CFPB has been effective where it is allowed to operate and, that in the absence of a serious policing presence, the financial industry has not changed its behavior.

Comments (2)Add Comment
written by PeonInChief, July 27, 2014 1:01
Ripping off poor people has become an art form, and one of the requirements is that the companies engaging in this performance art keep themselves outside regulation as much as possible. In California the Attorney General is trying to shut down Cash Call, which makes small loans at exorbitant interest. But it does not make very small loans ($2500 or less) because those are regulated by the state, and the interest rate is "capped" at 30%. Many tenants take out these kinds of loans, and car title loans as well, to pay security deposits when they have to move. In most cases they don't need $2,500, but are forced to take it, and pay interest rates of 179%--which makes 30% look pretty good.
Too Big To Exist
written by Tyler, July 30, 2014 12:15
I reject the idea that there are Wall Street banks that are too big to fail. Iceland allowed their banks to fail and is now flourishing.

Write comment

(Only one link allowed per comment)

This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comments.


Support this blog, donate
Combined Federal Campaign #79613
budget economy education employment Haiti health care housing inequality jobs labor labor market minimum wage paid family leave poverty recession retirement Social Security taxes unemployment unions wages Wall Street women workers working class

+ All tags