CEPR - Center for Economic and Policy Research


En Español

Em Português

Other Languages

Home Publications Blogs CEPR Blog A New York State of Inequality

A New York State of Inequality

Written by John Schmitt   
Wednesday, 15 December 2010 08:59
The New York based Fiscal Policy Insitute has a great new report (pdf) out on rising economic inequality in New York state and New York City. The FPI researchers have used state income tax data to do a state-level analysis of income concentration, modeled on the path-breaking research by Thomas Piketty and Emmanuel Saez, who used IRS data to look at national income inequality in the United States from 1913 to the present.

Here are just a few highlights. First, over the last 30 years, economic inequality increased more rapidly in New York state than it did in the economy as a whole, and more rapidly in New York City than it did in New York state.

Source: Fiscal Policy Institute.

Second, the middle and the bottom saw their share of total New York City income plummet since 1990.

Source: Fiscal Policy Institute.

Third, the increase in income inequality in the United States far outpaced what has happened in other rich economies.

Source: Fiscal Policy Institute.

I particularly like that the report attributes the rise in economic inequality primarily to political processes. FPI specifically rejects the standard economic explanation for rising inequality –a “skills shortage” that drives up wages of highly skilled workers at the top. “Among the well educated, too, there is an enormous degree of income polarization,” they write. “Those with the highest incomes do not simply have the best education. Something else must be at work since education, however important on an individual level, simply cannot serve as a compelling explanation for increased income concentration.” (p. 18)

This article originally appeared on John Schmitt's blog, No Apparent Motive.
Comments (1)Add Comment
Figure 8 conceals just HOW much the top 1% gets
written by JBG, December 15, 2010 11:45
In Figure 8, the "top 5%" bars include the top 1%'s share. If this is separated out, it is seen that the share of the next 4% starts at ~13% and rises to 14%. Those folks are still doing fine, but their share pales beside that of the top 1%.

Write comment

(Only one link allowed per comment)

This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comments.


Support this blog, donate
Combined Federal Campaign #79613
budget economy education employment Haiti health care housing inequality jobs labor labor market minimum wage paid family leave poverty recession retirement Social Security taxes unemployment unions wages Wall Street women workers working class

+ All tags