CEPR - Center for Economic and Policy Research

Multimedia

En Español

Em Português

Other Languages

Home Publications Blogs CEPR Blog Wall Street User Fee Could Relieve 1/3 of Sequester Cuts

Wall Street User Fee Could Relieve 1/3 of Sequester Cuts

Print
Written by Nicole Woo   
Tuesday, 12 November 2013 13:12

As the House-Senate conference committee prepares to meet to negotiate the 2014 budget on Wednesday, avoiding $109 billion in crude sequestration spending cuts seem to be a top priority. 

Simply repealing sequestration would be good for the economy, as "lowering the budget deficit right now leads to slower growth", but the current political situation is demanding that the cuts be replaced with other savings or revenues.

Some experts think user fees are a promising potential area of agreement.  When drivers buy gas, they pay a highway user fee that's incorporated into the price per gallon.  When airline passengers buy plane tickets, they pay security and airport user fees.  Last year, Republicans approved a bill increasing some FDA user fees, and President Obama's budget includes dozens of user fee options.  

An untapped source of user fees is financial trading.  Currently, the Securities and Exchange Commission's annual budget of about $1.7 billion is funded by a fee of less than 2 cents per every $1000 of stock transactions.  If that fee were raised to 30 cents per $1000, on a wider range of Wall Street trades, Congress' Joint Committee on Taxation estimates that it would raise about $39 billion per year.

Wall Street User Fee Could Relieve Over One-Third of 2014 Sequestration Spending Cuts
That's over one-third of the 2014 sequestration cuts.  As an added bonus, a Wall Street fee would affect middle-class families less than many other user fees, as the vast majority of financial speculation is being done by extremely wealthy traders.  While the options for a budget agreement seem to narrow, a workable idea like a Wall Street user fee deserves serious consideration.

Comments (1)Add Comment
why not $1/1000?
written by jfb2252, November 16, 2013 6:58
Why not cover all of sequestration and more with $1 per $1000 financial transaction tax? $130B a year, will likely reduce high speed trading and the chance of a flash crash, and still much less than the existing UK tax.

Write comment

(Only one link allowed per comment)

This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comments.

busy
 

CEPR.net
Support this blog, donate
Combined Federal Campaign #79613
budget economy education employment Haiti health care housing inequality jobs labor labor market minimum wage OccupyWallSt poverty recession retirement Social Security taxes unemployment unions wages Wall Street women workers working class

+ All tags