Haiti's Cholera Outbreak Whodunit
|Friday, 05 November 2010 14:51|
Laurie Garrett, senior fellow for global health at the Council on Foreign Relations, said it is clear that the disease was imported to Haiti but that it is still not clear by whom or how. She said the epidemic will contain lessons for humanitarian relief work and disaster relief around the world.Some experts, such as Partners in Health founder, U.N. deputy special envoy, and award-winning doctor and humanitarian, Paul Farmer, urged continued investigation into the cause, despite UN reluctance. Farmer added that the decision not to investigate the diseases origins, “sounds like politics to me, not science.” AP also reports that
John Mekalanos, a cholera expert and chairman of Harvard University's microbiology department, said it is important to know exactly where and how the disease emerged because it is a novel, virulent strain previously unknown in the Western Hemisphere - and public health officials need to know how it spreads.Meanwhile, echoing Farmer’s statement that politics may be hindering efforts to contain the disease, Julie Turkewitz reports that the Haitian government may be slow in releasing information on new cholera cases because of the upcoming November 28 “elections”, even as Hurricane Tomas bears down on Haiti, threatening to “increase the cholera caseload ‘earlier and faster,’” Turkewitz quotes the Pan American Health Organization as warning.
MINUSTAH was defensive when questions were first raised as to whether the outbreak could have come from waste water at a site used by their Nepalese troops. Higher ups at the UN likewise seem to have been in no hurry to consider the possibility that MINUSTAH might be responsible for bringing cholera to Haiti. In an interview last week, Imogen Wall, the Head of Communications for the UN’s Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, responded to the question “do we know sort of how the outbreak occurred and sort of what its sources are?” by calling it “appalling luck”. Appalling luck, perhaps, if human behavior had nothing to do with it, but appalling in other ways if it is due to negligence, carelessness, or preventable actions. A day after the interview, MINUSTAH announced it was indeed testing to see whether it might be responsible for the outbreak.
(Wall also highlights improved sanitation as key to avoiding spreading disease, but states that it is “a massive, massive long-term project.” Sanitation has indeed apparently been considered a “long-term project” ever since just after over a million people were displaced by the earthquake, despite warnings that poor sanitation could lead to disease outbreaks – and considered “long-term” even by large NGO’s that received tens of millions of U.S. taxpayer dollars specifically designated for sanitation, but have been slow to spend it.)
This latest MINUSTAH scandal should raise the question: why is MINUSTAH in Haiti? The UN often cites security needs as the rationale for annual extensions of MINUSTAH’s mission. Yet the complete lack of security threats and violence in the immediate aftermath of the quake – a time when foreign observers seemed most concerned that they would erupt – calls into question whether MINUSTAH’s presence is necessary, especially considering the many dark stains on its record, and frequent Protests against the Mission by Haitians. The UN Security Council has tasked MINUSTAH with assisting with logistics for this month’s elections, but the elections will be a sham if major political parties continue to be kept off the ballot for no justifiable reason.