CEPR - Center for Economic and Policy Research

Multimedia

En Español

Em Português

Other Languages

Home Publications Blogs The Americas Blog Media Bias in Brazil

Media Bias in Brazil

Print
Written by Mark Weisbrot   
Tuesday, 05 March 2013 08:20

The L.A. Times ran a very nice and uncommon report by correspondent Vincent Bevins about media bias in Brazil on Sunday.  The article notes that most of the major media is still controlled by the same handful of rich families who supported the military coup against the left government of João Goulart in 1964. These publications and TV outlets:

have been critical of the [Workers] party, despite a public approval rating for President Dilma Rousseff as high as 78%. Not a single major news outlet supports her, with some newspapers and magazines particularly harsh in their criticism.

“It's an extremely unique situation now in Brazil to have such a popular government and no major media outlet that supports it or presents a left-of-center viewpoint," says Laurindo Leal Filho, a media specialist at the University of Sao Paulo...

“Brazilian society was based on slavery for over 300 years, and has almost always been run by the same social strata," Leal Filho says. "Some parts of the upper class have learned to live with other parts of society that were previously excluded … but the media still reflect the values of the old-school elite, with very, very few exceptions."

Of course the same could be said – more strongly – about the media in all of the countries that now have left governments in South America:  certainly Bolivia (perhaps the worst media), Ecuador, Argentina, and Venezuela. We can also include Paraguay, where the major media helped depose the social democratic President Fernando Lugo last year.  All of these governments have had their battles with the media, and all (except Paraguay) have increased government media as a counter-weight, with varying degrees of success.  Venezuela has created a number of state TV stations, but they only have about 5.4 percent of the TV audience, so the opposition still has a media advantage there too.

As the article notes, the TV media – although biased – is not as hostile as the print media, and since most Brazilians get their news from TV, the widespread media bias has not been fatal to the government. The article didn’t mention it, but one reason that the Brazilian TV media is not as bad as the print media is that the second largest TV station is TV Record, which is owned by the Universal Church of the Kingdom of God.  This station is not biased against the government and it sees the majority of Brazilians, who are low-to-moderate income, as its target audience; it therefore provides not only a different editorial view but important competition to the TV media that is controlled by the “old-school elite.”     

But I would bet that the print media still has a very important negative influence. The PT government, especially since 2004, has been moving towards more sensible (and less neoliberal) economic policies: on monetary, fiscal, exchange rate, and other policies.  We don’t have a counter-factual, but it is likely that Brazilian conservatives, by dominating elite opinion through the print media, have helped to slow this process down considerably. 

Tags: Brazil | media coverage

 

CEPR.net
Support this blog, donate
Combined Federal Campaign #79613

About The Americas Blog

The Americas Blog seeks to present a more accurate perspective on economic and political developments in the Western Hemisphere than is often presented in the United States. It will provide information that is often ignored, buried, and sometimes misreported in the major U.S. media.

For more information, sign up for our Latin America News Roundup or visit the archives.

Argentina Bolivia Brazil Capriles Chavez Colombia congress coup cuba DEA ecuador election elections Honduras human rights latin america Maduro media media coverage mexico oas police Snowden State Department venezuela

+ All tags