## The Venezuelan Presidential Vote -- What is the Probability That It Could Have Been Stolen? |

Written by CEPR |

Friday, 26 April 2013 11:45 |

Opposition candidate Henrique Capriles is currently “boycotting” a second audit of the voting results for the April 14 In a CEPR press release we note that it is practically impossible to have obtained the results of the audit that took place after the polls closed on April 14 When the polls closed, a random sample of 53 percent[i] of all the machines (20,825 out of 39,303) was chosen, and a manual tally was made of the paper receipts. This “hot audit” was done on site, in the presence of the observers from both campaigns, as well as witnesses from the community. There were no reports from witnesses or election officials on site of discrepancies between the machine totals and the hand count. The following is a calculation of the probability of auditing 20,825 machines and finding zero errors when there are actually 50 among all 39,303 (this means that there are 50 machines with errors among the ones that were not audited). The assumption here is that there would have to be at least 50 bad machines -- i.e. where the machine count did not match the paper ballot – in order to reverse a margin of 272,000 votes. The probability of auditing 20,825 machines and finding zero errors when there are 50 machines with errors among all 39,303 machines is [i] Another 1 percent was audited the next day. |