CEPR - Center for Economic and Policy Research

Multimedia

En Español

Em Português

Other Languages

Home Publications Blogs CEPR Blog



Labor Market Policy Research Reports, Feb. 13 – 17, 2012 Print
Written by Marie-Eve Augier   
Friday, 17 February 2012 14:20

New reports were released this week by Center for American Progress, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Economic Policy Institute and Institute for Women's Policy Research


Center for American Progress

Meeting the Infrastructure Imperative
Donna Cooper


Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

Romney Budget Proposals Would Require Massive Cuts in Medicare, Medicaid, and Other Nondefense Spending
Richard Kogan and Paul N. Van de Water


Economic Policy Institute

No Relief in 2012 from High Unemployment for African Americans and Latinos
Algernon Austin


Institute for Women's Policy Research

Tipped Over the Edge: Gender Inequity in the Restaurant Industry

 
AEI Touts the End of the Deficit Problem Print
Written by Dean Baker   
Friday, 17 February 2012 11:39

Okay, they didn't do it in exactly those words, but that is the implication of a blog post by J.D. Keinke at the American Enterprise Institute. Keinke notes the sharp reduction in the growth rate of annual health care expenditures, with spending growth the last two years coming in at under 4.0 percent.

Keinke takes this as evidence that the health care system has fixed itself and that the country no longer suffers from out-of-control health care costs. We may want to hold off a bit longer and see a few more years of data before we break out the champagne. We may also question the story that this slowdown was due to the market working its magic in the health care sector.

There are a lot of efforts at cost control being tried at all levels of government. Perhaps these cost-control efforts really have nothing to do with the slowing of spending, but it would be good to see some evidence here rather than just an assertion.

It is also worth noting that this is a simple explanation for slower cost growth in at least one area: prescription drugs. According to the Food and Drug Administration's ratings, in the last decade, the industry has developed very few new "priority" drugs that involve qualitative improvements over existing drugs. New drugs have historically been the main cause of higher drug prices. In this case, the slower rate of growth in spending is a mixed blessing.

However, there is one thing we can say with certainty if Keinke is right about the future path of spending growth. If the rate of growth of health care spending remains at the pace of the last two years, then we can throw all those projections of exploding long-term budget deficits in the trash.

It was always health care costs that drove the scary budget scenarios that Peter Peterson and the deficit hawk gang loved to tout. If we are now living in a world where health care spending grows at pretty much the same rate as the overall economy, there will no longer be a deficit tsunami in the long-term budget projections that can be used to justify cuts in Social Security, Medicare and other important programs. If Keinke is right we can look forward to lots of unemployed deficit hawks in the near future.

 
Getting A Grip on Deficit Hysterics Print
Written by Dean Baker   
Tuesday, 14 February 2012 17:00

Promoting fears about the budget deficit is a major industry in Washington. The central theme is usually that we have out of control spending which will make us just like Greece in only a few short years. The policy take away from this story is that we have to cut Social Security and Medicare, and the sooner the better. This is just the idea put forth by Rep. Tom Cole (R-Okla.) in a recent piece that appeared on The Hill's Congress Blog.

Everything in this picture is wrong. The basic story of out-of-control deficits as an ongoing problem is nonsense. While people may have complained about the deficits in the Bush presidency, the debt-to-GDP ratio was actually falling by the end of his administration and was projected to continue to fall for the foreseeable future, even without the ending of the Bush tax cuts.

The factor that changed this picture was the economic downturn that followed the collapse of the housing bubble. The projections for deficits soared before President Obama even took office; the people who want to blame an Obama Administration spending spree for the deficit are missing the mark.

Read more...

 

 
Labor Market Policy Research Reports, Feb. 6-10, 2012 Print
Written by Marie-Eve Augier   
Friday, 10 February 2012 16:00

This week, the LMPRR features reports from:

Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

Contrary To “Entitlement Society” Rhetoric, Over Nine-Tenths of Entitlement Benefits Go To Elderly, Disabled, or Working Household
Arloc Sherman, Robert Greenstein, and Kathy Ruffing

House Spending-Cap Bills Would Enact Radical Ryan Budget into Law: Bills Would Worsen Recessions, Rule Out Balanced Deficit Reduction, and Facilitate Deep Cuts In Social Security And Medicare
Paul N. Van de Water

Strengthening State Fiscal Policies for a Stronger Economy
Erica Williams

Testimony Of Jared Bernstein Senior Fellow, Center On Budget And Policy Priorities Before The Senate Budget Committee United States Congress Hearing On “Assessing Inequality, Mobility And Opportunity”


Economic Policy Institute

Do Public School Teachers Really Receive Lavish Benefits? Richwine and Biggs’ Recent Report Doesn’t Make the Grade
Monique Morrissey

Right to Work: A Failed Policy a New Hampshire Update
Gordon Lafer

The ‘Toxics Rule’ And Jobs the Job-Creation Potential of the EPA’s New Rule on Toxic Power-Plant Emissions
Josh Bivens


National Employment Law Project

Ban the Box: Major U.S. Cities and Counties Adopt Fair Hiring Policies to Remove Unfair Barriers to Employment of People with Criminal Records

 
Low-Wage Lessons Print
Written by John Schmitt   
Thursday, 09 February 2012 11:15

As I write in a new CEPR briefing paper (pdf), the United States leads the wealthy world in the share of its workforce in low-wage jobs. According to the commonly used international definition of low-wage work –earning less than two-thirds of the median hourly wage– about one-fourth of US workers are low-wage.

low-wage-fig1-2012-01

The report draws five lessons from the experience of the United States and other rich countries over the last several decades:

  • Lesson 1: Economic Growth is not a Solution to the Problem of Low-wage Work
  • Lesson 2: More “Inclusive” Labor-market Institutions Lead to Lower Levels of Low-wage Work
  • Lesson 3: The United States is a Poor Model for Combating Low-wage Work
  • Lesson 4: Low-wage Work is Not a Clear-cut Stepping Stone to Higher-wage Work
  • Lesson 5: In the United States, Low Wages are among the Least of the Problems Facing Low-wage Workers
Read more...

 

 
Parting Ways with the Pessimists Print
Written by Dean Baker   
Monday, 06 February 2012 15:04

The economists who predicted the housing crisis tend to be a gloomy bunch, as Adam Davidson notes in his latest New York Times Magazine column. Dean Baker is the rare exception. In the following guest post on NPR's Planet Money blog, he explains why he has parted ways with the economic pessimists.

For more than five years before the recession began in December of 2007, I was one of the leading economic pessimists, warning of the housing bubble and the damage that its collapse would do to the economy. I based this pessimism on my analysis of the housing market, not a genetic disposition to pessimism. Given the economy's current situation, I find the warnings of the pessimists – the double-dip gang – to be wrongheaded and seriously counterproductive.

First to the economy's near-term prospects: the economy is growing and will in all probability continue to grow. Economies do generally grow. We see new investment, leading to more employment and higher productivity, which leads to higher profits and higher wages.

In the past when the economy has fallen into a recession it has been the result of plunges in house sales and car sales. Neither possibility seems plausible at the moment, primarily because both remain at extraordinarily low levels that leave little room for them to fall further. Even if they did fall, it would have only a limited impact since current demand is already so depressed.

Read more...

 

 
Labor Market Policy Research Reports, January 30 - February 3, 2012 Print
Written by Marie-Eve Augier   
Friday, 03 February 2012 14:35

The following reports on labor-market policy were released over the past week.


Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

Testimony of Jared Bernstein, Senior Fellow, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities Before the Committee on Education and the Workforce United States House of Representatives Hearing on “Expanding Opportunities for Job Creation”
Jared Bernstein


Economic Policy Institute

The benefits of raising Illinois’ minimum wage: An increase would help working families and the state economy
Doug Hall and Mary Gable

Jobs in the U.S. auto parts industry are at risk due to subsidized and unfairly traded Chinese auto parts
Robert E. Scott and Hilary Wething


Political Economy Research Institute

Economic Prospects: Fighting Seriously for Jobs and Social Security
Robert Pollin

The Austerians Attack! How we the people can fight back against plans to cut the social safety net
James Crotty


The Schwartz Center for Economic Policy Analysis & New York City Comptroller

Are New Yorkers Ready for Retirement?
Joelle Saad-Lessler, Teresa Ghilarducci, and Lauren Schmitz

New York’s Retirees: Falling into Poverty

A Research Report on the Downward Mobility of New York’s Next Generation of Retirees
Joelle Saad-Lessler, Teresa Ghilarducci, and Lauren Schmitz

 
Strong January Jobs Numbers Result in Drop to Unemployment Print
Written by Dean Baker   
Friday, 03 February 2012 11:25

Unemployment fell to 8.3 percent in January, bringing its drop over the last year to 0.8 percentage points, according to the latest Bureau of Labor Statistics employment report. The establishment survey showed an overall gain of 243,000 jobs — with the private sector adding 257,000, making up for losses in the public sector. Upward revisions to job growth for the prior two months have resulted in an average growth of 201,000 jobs over the last three months. Ignoring Census hiring, this is the strongest three-month stretch since February to April of last year when job growth averaged 239,000 a month.

African Americans saw an especially sharp decline in unemployment in January, with their overall rate falling by 2.2 percentage points to 13.6 percent, the lowest level since March of 2009. The unemployment rate for African-American men over age 20 fell by 3.0 percentage points to 12.7 percent, the lowest level since November of 2008. The drop for women over age 20 was 1.3 percentage points to 12.6 percent.

For a more in-depth analysis, read the latest Jobs Byte.

 
CEPR News January 2012 Print
Written by Dawn Lobell   
Thursday, 02 February 2012 10:45

The following highlights CEPR's latest research, publications, events and much more.

CEPR on Haiti Two Years After the Quake
It’s been two years since the devastating earthquake in Haiti. Through interviews, articles, Hill briefings and the Haiti Reconstruction and Relief Watch blog, CEPR marked the occasion by focusing attention on the ongoing humanitarian emergencies that hundreds of thousands struggle with daily. Half a million people remain homeless, more lack adequate sanitation, and the country grapples with a cholera epidemic the UN refuses to take responsibility for causing. CEPR has led the call – along with the Institute for Justice and Democracy in Haiti and other organizations – for UN accountability for this and other criminal actions in Haiti. Co-director Mark Weisbrot was quoted in this ABC News article on the cholera epidemic, and he appeared in this ABC News video on sexual assaults by UN troops. He was also cited at length in thisUSA Today report on recovery efforts.

Mark and CEPR Research Assistant Jake Johnston contributed a chapter to the book Tectonic Shifts: Haiti Since the Earthquake. Editor Mark Schuller discussed the book at a January 24th event CEPR sponsored along with TransAfrica, Teaching for Change, and Busboys and Poets. Jake was interviewed by FAIR’s syndicated radio show “Counterspin” about the situation in Haiti, and was cited in this Miami Herald report that was reprinted in dozens of U.S. newspapers. Mark took part in a panel discussion on Al Jazeera’s “Inside Story” that assessed the relief and recovery effort in Haiti. CEPR’s tracking of the aid and recovery situation was also cited in dozens more newspaper articles, blog posts, and radio reports.

CEPR participated in a series of congressional panels on Haiti— part of a Congressional Schedule of Events that took place January 24-25. On the 24th, Mark was a panelist at a briefing on the cholera outbreak sponsored by the offices of Rep. Frederica Wilson, Rep. Yvette Clarke, Rep. Barbara Lee, Rep. Donald M. Payne, and Rep. Maxine Waters. Later that same day, Mark was a panelist at another briefing sponsored by the offices of Rep. Yvette Clarke, Rep. Barbara Lee, and Rep. Donald M. Payne. That briefing followed the screening of excerpts of the documentary "Haiti: Where Did the Money Go?" which focuses on the status of relief efforts and steps towards increasing accountability of aid organizations. CEPR and the film were subsequently mentioned in this column by Clarence Page for the Chicago Tribune.

On January 25th, Mark participated in a briefing on Haiti’s political process, including the roles of the President, the Prime Minister, and members of Parliament; the various political parties in Parliament and who they represent; and the influence of various interest groups and stakeholders, including the wealthy elites, the business sector, and the impoverished majority. The briefing was moderated by Rep. Maxine Waters and was sponsored by Waters and Rep. Barbara Lee.

Read more...

 

 
Even the Guy Who Dosn't Care About Poor People Wants to Raise the Minimum Wage: Where Does President Obama Stand? Print
Written by Dean Baker   
Thursday, 02 February 2012 09:29

Former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney, who remarked yesterday that he doesn't care about the poor, supports indexing the minimum wage to inflation. If the minimum wage had been indexed since its last increase in July 2009 it would be $7.60 instead of $7.25. If it had been indexed to inflation since 1978 it would be almost $9.00 today.

The Democrats have historically been the major proponents of a higher minimum wage ever since a federal minimum wage law was first instituted in 1938. It will be interesting to see if President Obama or other leaders in the Democratic Party feel the need to respond to Romney's proposal.

 
Brazil: Record-Low Unemployment But Jobs Picture Mixed Print
Tuesday, 31 January 2012 14:30

Last week Brazil hit record-low unemployment of 4.7 percent (or 5.5 percent, seasonally-adjusted). But almost all of the jobs created in the last three months were in the business services, finance and real estate. This is remarkable: that sector comprises only 16.9 percent of all jobs.

ladb-1-27-2012-fig3

Meanwhile, industry and commerce – sectors that have traditionally been drivers of job growth – have actually lost jobs for two quarters in a row. This is the first time that industry has lost jobs outside of a recession since 2006.

For a more in-depth analysis, read our latest Latin America Data Byte.

 
Case-Shiller 20-City Index Falls Again in November Print
Written by Dean Baker   
Tuesday, 31 January 2012 12:15

The seasonally adjusted Case-Shiller 20-City index fell 0.7 percent in November, according to the latest indicators and developments in the housing sector. The index, which is in its seventh consecutive month of decline, has now fallen in 17 of the last 18 months. In recent months, the rate of price decline appears to be accelerating modestly, with prices dropping at a 7.9 percent annual rate over the last three months compared to a 3.7 percent decline over the last year.

There is little reason to expect that house prices will stop their decline any time soon. The best path would be a slowing rate of decline with, prices perhaps leveling off by the end of 2012. In several markets, particularly cities on the West Coast, the housing bubbles have not yet fully deflated. Nothing should be done to prevent them from deflating; however, it would be desirable to see prices stabilize and possibly rise somewhat in markets where the bubble has fully deflated and the market is overshooting on the down side.

For a more in-depth analysis, read the latest Housing Market Monitor.

 
Fact-Checking the Fact-Checkers on Honduras Print
Written by Dan Beeton   
Friday, 27 January 2012 17:01

Both the New York Times and Washington Post’s fact-checks on the GOP presidential debate Thursday night missed the mark regarding former Senator Rick Santorum’s (R – PA) comments about Honduras.

Responding to the question, “What would each of you do as president to more deeply engage in Latin America and, importantly, to support the governments and the political parties that support democracy and free markets?”, Santorum’s answer included this statement regarding the Obama administration’s response to the 2009 coup in Honduras:

Our policy in Central and South America under this administration has been abysmal. The way we have treated, in particular, countries like Honduras, Honduras, which stood up for the rule of law, which threw out a would-be dictator who was using the Chavez playbook from Venezuela in order to try to run for re-election in Honduras, and the United States government, instead of standing behind the -- the people in the parliament, the people in the Supreme Court, who tried to enforce the constitution of Honduras -- instead of siding with them, the Democrats, President Obama sided with two other people in South America -- excuse me -- Central America and South America. Chavez and Castro and Obama sided against the people of Honduras.

The Washington Post’s The Fact Checker wrote:

Santorum’s statement reflects a commonly held viewpoint among conservatives, but it glosses over the fact that there was a coup against the democratically elected president of Honduras, Manuel Zelaya. The Obama administration, working with the Organization of American States, refused to recognize the parliamentary leader who had been named president and instead tried to broker a compromise that would have allowed Zelaya to serve out his term. But that effort failed. Eventually a new election was held and another man was elected president.

Read more...

 

 
Labor Market Policy Research Reports, January 23-27, 2012 Print
Written by Marie-Eve Augier   
Friday, 27 January 2012 15:30

Center for American Progress

Movin’ It and Improvin’ It!: Using Both Education Strategies  to Increase Teaching Effectiveness
Craig D. Jerald


Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

Proposed Kansas Tax Break for "Pass-Through" Profits Is Poorly Targeted and Will Not Create Jobs
By Nicholas Johnson and Michael Mazerov


Center for Economic and Policy Research

Low-wage Lessons
John Schmitt

Pension Liabilities: Fear Tactics and Serious Policy
David Rosnick and Dean Baker

 
Union Membership Hits Plateau in 2011 Print
Written by John Schmitt and Janelle Jones   
Friday, 27 January 2012 14:30

Union membership hit a plateau in 2011 after falling by almost 1.4 million workers between 2008 and 2010, according to the latest Bureau of Labor Statistics Union Membership report. At 14.8 million (up about 49,000), the total number of union members and the share of workers in a union, 11.8 percent (down 0.1 percentage points), were essentially unchanged last year.

union-fig1-2012

In the public sector, the total number of union members declined 61,000, as squeezed federal, state, and local governments cut back employment. Union density (the share of the workforce that is a member of a union) in the public sector, however, increased 0.8 percentage points, to 37.0 percent - due to overall employment in the sector declining more rapidly than union membership. In the private sector, union membership increased by about 110,000, with union density holding steady at 6.9 percent.

For a more in-depth analysis, read our latest Union Byte.

 
Is President Obama Proposing That the Government Buy Out the Banks' Bad Mortgages? Print
Written by Dean Baker   
Wednesday, 25 January 2012 17:49

That seems to be what the administration is proposing, according to an article in the New York Times. The article says that the Obama Administration wants to let people with underwater mortgages with private lenders refinance into government-guaranteed mortgages.

As described in the article, this would effectively mean that the government will be giving banks 100 cents on the dollar for mortgages where they could have anticipated substantial losses. If this is true, it would mean that the banks and investors who hold stakes in mortgage-backed securities would be getting far more money out of the deal than the homeowners who the policy is ostensibly designed to help.

To take a simple example, suppose a homeowner owes $250,000 on a home that is currently worth $200,000. It is likely that this homeowner will at some point default on the mortgage or need to make a short sale, which could result in the bank losing $50,000 or more. (Foreclosures involve substantial legal expenses and require that the bank pay a realtor to resell the property.)

On the other hand, if the government guarantees a new loan, the bank gets it full $250,000 back. The government would now stand in the same position as the bank had formerly, possibly losing $50,000 or more if the homeowner defaults. On the other hand, the benefit to the homeowner is paying a lower interest rate. If this arrangement results in a 2-percentage-point drop in the mortgage interest rate, the homeowner would save roughly $5,000 a year. In this story, the homeowner is almost certain to get much less out of the deal than the bank or investor.

 

 
Obama's Main Constituency Has Always Been the Major Media Print
Written by Mark Weisbrot   
Wednesday, 25 January 2012 16:00

To understand President Obama’s State of the Union speech, you have to understand his political strategy. From the beginning of his 2008 campaign, his main constituency has always been the major media. He has always calculated that he can win without the energy companies and even some other big campaign donors, but not if the mainstream media doesn’t like him. So a little bit of populism on the tax issues – e.g, the Buffet Rule - is now acceptable, especially in the context of deficit reduction and Republicans’ pro 1 percent extremism.

The other key constituency is the swing voters – he is taking Democrats for granted – which for the last four decades have been composed largely of white working-class voters. According to the leading Democratic pollster Stan Greenberg, the speech was effective with swing voters. So, overall a success for Obama.

And the people? There were a lot of specific proposals around energy, education, skills training, infrastructure, etc. But with the President committed to the silly goal of deficit reduction, with Republican obstructionism, and Obama’s general lack of willingness to fight for human needs – remember his promises of a public option in health care reform? Or labor law reform? – I’m not holding my breath. Especially employment – can’t do much about that without federal spending. And seniors, hold on to your wallet when he mentions “strengthening Social Security.”

His foreign policy is much worse – “all options on the table” for Iran, which is code for the threat of yet another war. No commitment to get out of Afghanistan. When he talks about how “America is back” with “the enduring power of our moral example,” I see images of U.S. soldiers pissing on corpses, drones slaughtering civilians in Pakistan and Afghanistan, massacres like Haditha (with impunity).

“Above all,” he tells us, “our freedom endures because of the men and women in uniform who defend it.” This could hardly be more false. America has lost more freedoms in the last decade, including during Obama’s presidency, than any other developed democracy in the world; and nobody fighting these unnecessary wars is defending our freedom.

This post originally appeared in The Guardian.

 
Is the Obama Administration Soft on Crime? Print
Written by Dean Baker   
Tuesday, 24 January 2012 06:21

That would seem to be the case from the leaks about a mortgage settlement which would reportedly give the banks and their executives immunity for all their misdeeds connected with the housing bubble in exchange for $20 billion in principle write-downs on underwater mortgages. And, Naked Capitalism reminds us that this $20 billion need not even come out of the banks' pockets. This includes write downs on mortgages that they are servicing, which means that the money would come out of investors' pockets.

Apart from the limited money at stake, the question is why would there be a reason to grant immunity for criminal wrong-doing? If people at these banks committed fraud, for example by lying about possessing documents that they did not possess, lying about the terms of loans to mortgage applicants or misrepresenting the mortgages in pools to investors, then why would we want to give them a get out of jail free card?

If no such fraud was committed, then there is no reason to include this sort of immunity in a settlement. The only reason to grant immunity of this type is if fraud was committed and the Obama administration wants to let the bankers off the hook.

 
Labor Market Policy Research Reports, January 16 – 20, 2012 Print
Written by Marie-Eve Augier   
Friday, 20 January 2012 15:45

This week, we post links to reports from the Center for American Progress, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and National Employment Law Project.


Center for American Progress

Building a Technically Skilled Workforce
Louis Soares and Stephen Steigleder


Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

House republican proposal would undermine foundation of unemployment insurance system
Hannah Shaw and Chad Stone


National Employment Law Project

Winning Wage Justice: A Summary of Research on Wage and Hour Violations in the United State

Winning Wage Justice: Choosing the Policy Options Right for Your Community

 
CBO Letter on FTT: When There's No Smoke, There's No Fire Print
Written by Dean Baker and Nicole Woo   
Friday, 20 January 2012 13:20

Late last year, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) responded to an inquiry from Senator Orrin Hatch about the potential impact of a financial transaction tax (FTT) of three one-hundredths of a percent on (1) GDP and jobs, (2) municipal financing, and (3) U.S. Treasuries. 

In general, CBO responded that the FTT “could” or “would probably” cause “slight” negative effects in the short term, and it never quantifies these effects.  As for long-term impact, CBO states that it does not know whether it will be positive or negative.  While some media and critics have held up this letter as a major setback for the FTT, let’s take a closer look at what CBO actually said:

Question #1:  What impact would the proposed tax have on gross domestic product (GDP) and on U.S. jobs?

CBO’s response:

In the short term, imposing the transaction tax would probably reduce output and employment.  Beyond the first few years, however, the tax’s net impact on the economy is unclear… Employment would be unaffected in the long term.

This appears to be far from damning.  CBO dilutes its assessment of the short-term impact with the qualifier, “probably,” and says that the long-term impact on GDP is “unclear” and that jobs will not be affected.  In explaining its reasoning, CBO looks at effects on investment and decides to counter an argument in favor of the FTT: 

Some analysts believe that… the tax would reduce volatility… [and] might discourage short-term speculation, which can destabilize markets… However, the tax would discourage all short-term trading, not just speculation—including transactions by well-informed traders and transactions that stabilize markets. 

In fact, the extent to which “well-informed” traders can stabilize prices is trivial. The transactions that CBO refers to happen when there are slight price discrepancies between different exchanges, and traders make profits by capitalizing on these gaps.  If, for example, the FTT were to make this trading profitable only when the gap between prices of a certain stock rose to 11 cents instead of 10 cents, then the FTT would allow prices to be slightly further out of balance for a little longer, which has essentially zero consequence.

Read more...

 

 
<< Start < Prev 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Next > End >>

Page 27 of 53

CEPR.net
Support this blog, donate
Combined Federal Campaign #79613
budget economy education employment Haiti health care housing inequality jobs labor labor market minimum wage paid family leave poverty recession retirement Social Security taxes unemployment unions wages Wall Street women workers working class

+ All tags