Comments for Unemployment Claims Go Unmentioned at http://www.cepr.net , comment 1 to 3 out of 3 comments http://www.cepr.net Thu, 23 May 2013 00:21:35 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.3 http://www.cepr.net/index.php/beat-the-press/unemployment-claims-go-unmentioned/#comment-104 Yep, the recovery will happen whether it does or not according to most economists and the MSM ... The retail sales numbers were equally amusing. Same store sales were up, but there were fewer companies in business and the survivors have closed underperforming stores ... Oh and the nations biggest retailer, WalMart somehow didn't make the report. - mmckinl Fri, 16 Apr 2010 16:20:36 +0100 http://www.cepr.net/index.php/beat-the-press/unemployment-claims-go-unmentioned/#comment-95 "The 4-week moving average was 457,750, a number that is far above levels consistent with job growth." What is the level which would be consistent with job growth?... Wouldn't anything beneath the high be consistent with job growth? And if that is the case (which someone can tell me it's not) then how is the wording "far above levels consistent with job growth" justified? - Aditya Savara Fri, 16 Apr 2010 05:25:52 +0100 http://www.cepr.net/index.php/beat-the-press/unemployment-claims-go-unmentioned/#comment-94 For 90 percent of the country the labor market is the economy.[quote][/quote] And what about the other 10% Mr Nanny Economist, the ones who are leading us out of this cesspool of government spending? What about all the unemployed Geese who would be laying more Golden Eggs but are stifled with more government intervention every time they raise their entrepreneurial heads into the line of fire from liberal fascists? Don't you even bother to listen to Phil Gramm, that those with a job are always hired by someone with more money than they have? Stupid liberals. - izzatzo Fri, 16 Apr 2010 04:23:18 +0100