<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>How Did NPR Decide that the Employer Penalties in the Health Care Bill Are Large?</title>
		<description>Comments for How Did NPR Decide that the Employer Penalties in the Health Care Bill Are Large? at http://www.cepr.net , comment 1 to 6 out of 6 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.cepr.net</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 22:52:27 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>NPR mixed bag with jewels</title>
			<link>http://www.cepr.net/index.php/beat-the-press/how-did-npr-decide-that-the-employer-penalties-in-the-health-care-bill-are-large/#comment-317</link>
			<description>Robert Siegel.

Need I say more.  If you're not sure, just listen to about 5-7 of his pieces.  You'll be pleased I bet.
 - Hal Horvath</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:04:25 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.cepr.net/index.php/beat-the-press/how-did-npr-decide-that-the-employer-penalties-in-the-health-care-bill-are-large/#comment-314</link>
			<description>NPR is still scraping along the bottom.  The fair and balanced interview ratio appears to be 3 republicans for each democrat interviewed.  Mora Liarson is especially bad.  And goodness, why is Kookie Roberts still on there?  The headline reader for Morning Edition is pleasant enough, but she still can't get through a sentence without stumbling over her words.  And the headline reader on ATC....well, nevermind.  Way past time to clean up NPR news shows. Nina Totenberg's coverage on the SC is generally good. - Duck Butter</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 13:59:42 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>'It is not clear how NPR determined that the fee was &quot;hefty.&quot;'</title>
			<link>http://www.cepr.net/index.php/beat-the-press/how-did-npr-decide-that-the-employer-penalties-in-the-health-care-bill-are-large/#comment-311</link>
			<description>The read it on the US Chamber of Commerce website.

-- MrJM - MrJM</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 08:49:47 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.cepr.net/index.php/beat-the-press/how-did-npr-decide-that-the-employer-penalties-in-the-health-care-bill-are-large/#comment-309</link>
			<description>Someone said that Izzatzo was being very ironic, and for a while I thought I understood what he was saying, in that light, but generally, I just don't get this guy. (If it's a guy.) - Marty, Brentwood</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 07:10:59 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.cepr.net/index.php/beat-the-press/how-did-npr-decide-that-the-employer-penalties-in-the-health-care-bill-are-large/#comment-307</link>
			<description>Izzatzo, For the first time in weeks I actually looked at one of your comments.  I regret my mistake.  What a waste of 15 seconds!! - AbqMike</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 04:19:44 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.cepr.net/index.php/beat-the-press/how-did-npr-decide-that-the-employer-penalties-in-the-health-care-bill-are-large/#comment-303</link>
			<description>The penalty for refusing a mandate,
To buy insurance from the switchbaits,
Who force everyone to have it,
So they can continue the racket,

Whether hefty or low matters not,
Employees will take the hit,
One way or other, forced to buy it,
From the corporate mobster tit. - izzatzo</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 02:49:43 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
