<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>How Do Washington Post Reporters Know Democrats are Concerned That: &quot;Government Spending ...</title>
		<description>Comments for How Do Washington Post Reporters Know Democrats are Concerned That: &quot;Government Spending Is Out of Control&quot;  at http://www.cepr.net , comment 1 to 9 out of 9 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.cepr.net</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 18:58:44 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>replica watches</title>
			<link>http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/how-do-washington-post-reporters-know-democrats-are-concerned-that-qgovernment-spending-is-out-of-controlq/#comment-2071</link>
			<description>The very other govt officials having close relationship with enjoy are Obama. With reference to Obama's enjoy, maybe we must add a query mark towards &quot;luxurious&quot;, since his enjoy Jorg Gray 6500 is really a really normal enjoy only deserving about 260 pounds. Nevertheless, even though its price tag is far lower than Pateck Philippe, it still might be treated as a high quality replica panerai watches, and the exact only reason is that Jorg Gray is the exact enjoy worn by American first of all black [url=http://www.watcheslux.com/montblanc-watches.html]replica montblanc watches[/url]
 - replica watches</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 21:52:49 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/how-do-washington-post-reporters-know-democrats-are-concerned-that-qgovernment-spending-is-out-of-controlq/#comment-725</link>
			<description>&quot;it's only fair. politicians are always telling us what they think the American people think.

There.  Fixed. - bobbyp</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 16:23:38 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/how-do-washington-post-reporters-know-democrats-are-concerned-that-qgovernment-spending-is-out-of-controlq/#comment-723</link>
			<description>it's only fair. politicians are always telling us what the American people think.  - bt</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 14:27:11 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/how-do-washington-post-reporters-know-democrats-are-concerned-that-qgovernment-spending-is-out-of-controlq/#comment-722</link>
			<description>I wish I had read more about the pressure the legislators faced during Franklin Roosevelt's presidency that caused them, after a few years of the New Deal, to cut back government spending thereby throwing the country back into recession.  I simply don't know the arguments that could have persuaded them to do such a thing or whether they, too, had been captured by the lobbying community.

I do know that today's legislators have been captured by big business lobbyists, and I know that the public's distress over the deficit has been manufactured by people who have been working for years to reorganize, if not privatize, the two or three effective social insurance programs this country offers.

It's easy to see why the Republicans would be banging the drums for deficit reduction - they want to be back in power.  But I don't believe even the mystics at the Post can devine the motives of the Democrats.  Could be the Dem's are listening to their constituents hollering that since they have to tighten their belts and make do with less, the government should have to do the same.  Or maybe the Dem's are so politically indebted to Wall Street for campaign contributions that they're willing to throw the economy into a double-dip recession to keep the money flowing into their campaigns.  Or maybe Democratic politicians are just terminally stupid.  Maybe they really do believe government spending is out of control, or perhaps there are other reasons yet to be identified.

But I don't believe the Post writers know enough to flatly state, as this article does, that one reason represents these politicians' reasoning - or panic - more than any other.  Maybe reporters and editors these days have their own reasons for prefering to believe one narrative over another.  Or maybe they're just too lazy to look beyond the rhetoric coming out of the politicians' mouths. Could be all of the above. - Queen of Sheba</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 14:20:06 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/how-do-washington-post-reporters-know-democrats-are-concerned-that-qgovernment-spending-is-out-of-controlq/#comment-721</link>
			<description>For comments 1,2, and 4:
They could just report what the politicians say, perhaps with some information about other reasons that the politician might be taking the position she is taking (a donor wants it, they are being forced to by leadership, etc.)  

They could simply report the fact, which is that politician X said Y, without including the assumption of honesty.

And it blows my mind that you had trouble thinking of this alternative on your own. - ptm</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 12:35:23 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/how-do-washington-post-reporters-know-democrats-are-concerned-that-qgovernment-spending-is-out-of-controlq/#comment-720</link>
			<description>These reporters don't need to say how they know these things. They have powers that enable them to look deep into the very souls of people they don't even talk to. No thought or desire can be hidden from them no matter how skillful or deviously clever the politician is. They know all and see all. That's why they get paid the big bucks by who knows who, but no matter, they tell us the results of their soul peering for free. Why? Because they are such good, pure and honest people. That's why. This must be true. Otherwise it would mean they had an agenda and this was all BS. - Thomas Dooley</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 07:32:21 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/how-do-washington-post-reporters-know-democrats-are-concerned-that-qgovernment-spending-is-out-of-controlq/#comment-719</link>
			<description>Why does anyone think that the Democrats are all that much better than Republicans?  The Democrats only look good because the Republicans have become entirely disconnected from a reality-based world.  The Democrats are just as willing to sell us out for the good of the FIRE industries, and their concern with deficit reduction in a recession is only one piece of the evidence. - PeonInChief</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 06:56:05 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/how-do-washington-post-reporters-know-democrats-are-concerned-that-qgovernment-spending-is-out-of-controlq/#comment-714</link>
			<description>What the hell are they supposed to report, what they think the politicians should have said?

Let's game theory this into infinity, and start reporting what they think they think they think they should have said.  


Stupid liberals. - izzatzo</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 04:06:17 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>broken clock is right 2wice a day</title>
			<link>http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/how-do-washington-post-reporters-know-democrats-are-concerned-that-qgovernment-spending-is-out-of-controlq/#comment-713</link>
			<description>or, as a regular poster here would say...
stupid democrats. - frankenduf</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 04:05:25 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
