<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Is Eliminating a Tax Break a New Tax?</title>
		<description>Comments for Is Eliminating a Tax Break a New Tax? at http://www.cepr.net , comment 1 to 2 out of 2 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.cepr.net</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 21:00:18 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>replica watches</title>
			<link>http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/is-eliminating-a-tax-break-a-new-tax/#comment-3028</link>
			<description>I appreciate for your post! I hope you will keep it on. I also want to make friends with you and share my favorite replica watches to you. I am focus on you.[url=http://www.watcheslux.com/versace-watches.html]replica versace watches[/url]
 - sean.waches</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2010 15:10:22 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/is-eliminating-a-tax-break-a-new-tax/#comment-1154</link>
			<description>But officer, why not write the speeding ticket based on total miles per hour instead of incremental miles per hour?  So for doing 90 in a 75 zone, the ticket would not be for the additional 15 miles per hour over the speed limit, but on a pro rated average basis starting from zero.  That way speeding tickets would be a fair flat tax, neither regressive nor progressive, and not suppress incentives to drive efficiently.  Don't you read Econ 101?

Officer: But that would mean everyone driving within the speed limit would have a new tax and pay most of the revenue, and everyone driving over the limit would get a tax break.

Driver: Exactly.  I have to go now, I'm late for a hedge fund meeting. - izzatzo</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 04:41:09 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
