<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Franklin Raines on Deficit Reduction: More Advice from the Folks That Wrecked the Economy</title>
		<description>Comments for Franklin Raines on Deficit Reduction: More Advice from the Folks That Wrecked the Economy at http://www.cepr.net , comment 1 to 10 out of 10 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.cepr.net</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 14:00:56 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>inflation and the rich</title>
			<link>http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/franklin-raines-on-deficit-reduction-more-advice-from-the-folks-that-wrecked-the-economy#comment-1580</link>
			<description>skeptonomist, you are right about the FED and Treasury auctions, but wrong about the consequences of inflation for the rich. The rich do much better than the poor in inflationary times. This is because their assets go up in value  as a direct cause of inflation. Without the low interest rates of the last ten years, there could not have been a housing bubble. And while the las year or two have not been pretty , take a look at the net distribution of wealth in this country: the rich have still managed to increase their share of the country's wealth, despite the recent crash in real estate, the stock market and other asset classs. - BTN</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 18:52:12 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Thanks skep</title>
			<link>http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/franklin-raines-on-deficit-reduction-more-advice-from-the-folks-that-wrecked-the-economy#comment-1564</link>
			<description>Silly me, it never occurred to me that the fed would game the bond auction. Going to have to pay way more attention to the 'fed is not treasury' truth to avoid confusing them. - OJC</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 13:02:53 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/franklin-raines-on-deficit-reduction-more-advice-from-the-folks-that-wrecked-the-economy#comment-1557</link>
			<description>OJC:

The federal government pays interest on its debt, which is mostly in bonds.  The current average maturity is about 2 years, so it has to be renewed at current rates.  The interest paid is an item under expenditures in the federal budget, the size of which is dependent on current as well as past interest rates.  As long as the debt exists, you can say that the interest is compounding.  As Dean has pointed out before,  this budget item is currently very low because of generally low rates.  The Fed normally buys as many short-term bonds and recently even long-term bonds as required to keep interest rates low (currently), so it is really in control of auction prices.  If you put in a low bid for a Treasury offering, you won't get it - the Fed will in effect outbid you.

People often ask who will buy the bonds if the debt keeps expanding, especially if the Chinese decide for some reason to quit buying.  As Dean has said, the answer is simple - the Fed.  This may eventually lead to inflation, but inflation won't kill you, unless you are very rich and have a lot of assets that would be devalued.  Even then it wouldn't actually kill you, it would just wipe out your wealth - you might have to go to work. - skeptonomist</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 04:30:48 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>hey skeptonomist, whose c omments I enjoy</title>
			<link>http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/franklin-raines-on-deficit-reduction-more-advice-from-the-folks-that-wrecked-the-economy#comment-1554</link>
			<description>How does interest compounding enter the picture? As I understand it, bonds are auctioned off today, at whatever price they bring, to be redeemed at face value next Tuesday (or sometime). The interest is defined by the sale price, not the fed, and is fixed. Unless more borrowing is required for redemption, but that would be new debt. - OJC</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 15:48:50 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>eric wears white socks</title>
			<link>http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/franklin-raines-on-deficit-reduction-more-advice-from-the-folks-that-wrecked-the-economy#comment-1548</link>
			<description>lol to eric- i just got that :) - frankenduf</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 07:18:13 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/franklin-raines-on-deficit-reduction-more-advice-from-the-folks-that-wrecked-the-economy#comment-1547</link>
			<description>I think it was meant to be Harold Baines, but it possibly could be Tim Raines. - Eric</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 05:56:12 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/franklin-raines-on-deficit-reduction-more-advice-from-the-folks-that-wrecked-the-economy#comment-1543</link>
			<description>Certainly the debt is augmented by compound interest.  But since the Fed controls interest rates, it has the power to insure that that augmentation is less than that of GDP.  To raise interest rates when GDP growth is low, as the Fed has done at times in the past and as some people advocate now, is hardly conducive to reduction of the debt.
----------
Personally I prefer Claude Raines.  His famous line &quot;Round up the usual suspects&quot; (and presumably put them on trial) could be applied to Greenspan et al.
 - skeptonomist</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 04:30:44 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/franklin-raines-on-deficit-reduction-more-advice-from-the-folks-that-wrecked-the-economy#comment-1537</link>
			<description>I think Harold Raines and Franklin Raines might be two different people.  The article is clearly about Franklin.  &quot;Harold&quot; seems to be from an incorrectly captioned photo. - peter</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 02:42:02 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/franklin-raines-on-deficit-reduction-more-advice-from-the-folks-that-wrecked-the-economy#comment-1535</link>
			<description>This entire Post piece is infuriating.  Printing Franklin Raines's pronouncements on the deficit is only one of its outrageous failures.  The entire first few paragraphs of the article assume facts not in evidence - and some not even reasonable - as though they were already-accepted gospel, e.g., &quot;But 2011 is the year policymakers are going to have to put in place a serious plan to reduce the deficit, phasing changes in gradually so as not to destabilize the recovery. Otherwise, we risk credit markets turning against the United States, leading to our own sovereign debt crisis.&quot;

And the reporter's cure for this terrible situation is equally disingenuous, &quot;Instead [of leaving the crafting of a deficit reduction plan up to congress], the White House will have to offer a detailed proposal (think defense cuts, Social Security reform, a strict health-care budget and the reduction of a slew of tax breaks), cooperate with both parties to hash out a workable plan and find ways to offer political cover for those willing to step up.&quot; 

Has this reporter been living in a cave since Obama took office?  There is no &quot;cooperation&quot; between the White House and the Republican members of congress nor with conservative Democrats most of the time.  By &quot;cooperate&quot; with both parties, I assume the reporter was suggesting that Obama just devise an initial plan that gives the conservatives what they want in the first place to avoid a big, ugly congressional melee televised on C-SPAN and discussed ad nauseum on cable teevee.

Good luck with that.  I'm planning to invest in popcorn futures. - Queen of Sheba</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 02:23:42 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/franklin-raines-on-deficit-reduction-more-advice-from-the-folks-that-wrecked-the-economy#comment-1532</link>
			<description>&quot;Most of the [s]long-run deficit[/s][i]unemployment[/i] is composed of [s]the interest on debt[/s][i] the same cheats on stimulus welfare today with no savings who thought houses were free[/i] piled up because [s]we were[/s][i] they are[/i] unwilling to pay today (or over an economic cycle) for the spending [s]we[/s][i] they[/i] want today.  [i]Just because I was instrumental in enabling the housing bubble while denying it and becoming rich in the process had nothing to do with it.[/i]&quot; - izzatzo</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 01:35:08 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
