Comments for State Budget Deficits Are Due to Plunging Revenue, Not Higher Spending at http://www.cepr.net , comment 1 to 7 out of 7 comments http://www.cepr.net Thu, 23 May 2013 01:35:51 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.3 http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/state-budget-deficits-are-due-to-plunging-revenue-not-higher-spending#comment-1927 Across the land public pools shut down and summer parks programs suspended for lack of money to pay high school and college temporary help. Roll on! Let's go bomb Iran and N. Korea out of frustration! - diesel Thu, 05 Aug 2010 10:06:49 +0100 http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/state-budget-deficits-are-due-to-plunging-revenue-not-higher-spending#comment-1917 What is the source article of the contention that state spending has not continued to rise? We know unemployment compensation is through the roof. Hard to believe that states finally got religion on spending, right? - Jack Thu, 05 Aug 2010 04:51:04 +0100 http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/state-budget-deficits-are-due-to-plunging-revenue-not-higher-spending#comment-1915 Mr. Baker completely ignores the fact that States have been spending way too much. In fact, if you look at the budgets of the North East, they were in record deficit territory at the height of the boom. Just because you didn't increase spending doesn't mean you aren't spending too much to begin with. - Ben Thu, 05 Aug 2010 04:14:41 +0100 http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/state-budget-deficits-are-due-to-plunging-revenue-not-higher-spending#comment-1914 Health costs may not be the acute cause of the crisis for state and local governments. But they ought to be acknowledged as a chronic cause, especially in the last decade, especially in some states. - Nerrie Thu, 05 Aug 2010 03:51:55 +0100 http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/state-budget-deficits-are-due-to-plunging-revenue-not-higher-spending#comment-1911 The revenue of some states fluctuates more than others and constitutionally in good years they may be required to spend more or cut taxes, both bad things in Keynesian economics. So they are being profligate - as a result of conservative balanced-budget clauses in state constitutions. States should be required to pay back any money advanced from the federal government in bad times. - skeptonomist Thu, 05 Aug 2010 03:21:54 +0100 http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/state-budget-deficits-are-due-to-plunging-revenue-not-higher-spending#comment-1910 "Republican leaders criticized the package as a giveaway to bankers and an undeserved bailout for profligate financial corporations"- oh sorry, i misread it - frankenduf Thu, 05 Aug 2010 03:12:13 +0100 http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/state-budget-deficits-are-due-to-plunging-revenue-not-higher-spending#comment-1907 The paradox of state revenue falling with less spending is easily explained by the Arizona Zero Sum Lunch Theory. Any economist knows there's no free lunch, so while spending less would be expected to result in increased revenue, it can't if someone gets the additional revenue as a free lunch. That's why even less must be spent, to eliminate free lunches in order for the economy to recover. It has nothing to do with declines in the level of aggregate demand, which is like claiming that reductions in the water level reduces the rate of drowning. The water level is not the problem, the problem is how many free loaders are in the water who are not supposed to be there. Stupid liberals. - izzatzo Thu, 05 Aug 2010 02:00:33 +0100