<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>The Washington Post's Entry in the &quot;How Many Big Things Can You Get Wrong in a Short ...</title>
		<description>Comments for The Washington Post's Entry in the &quot;How Many Big Things Can You Get Wrong in a Short Article?&quot; Contest at http://www.cepr.net , comment 1 to 3 out of 3 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.cepr.net</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 01:04:58 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Izzatzo's buyers and sellers.</title>
			<link>http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/the-washington-posts-entry-in-the-qhow-many-big-things-can-you-get-wrong-in-a-short-articleq-contest#comment-3838</link>
			<description>.
Izzatso thinks that buyers and sellers “benefit from trade due to conflicting expectations of prices moving in opposite directions”  Not true: if both buyers and sellers expect prices to remain totally stable or more or less stable, both sides normally still “benefit from trade”. - Ralph Musgrave</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 10:03:14 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>housing bubble?</title>
			<link>http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/the-washington-posts-entry-in-the-qhow-many-big-things-can-you-get-wrong-in-a-short-articleq-contest#comment-3832</link>
			<description>Why be shocked?  The last guy to ask for a housing bubble while Dean Baker and Robert Shiller were saying we were already in a bubble won the Nobel prize in economics.  Now that guy is inciting the yellow peril from the 30s with incessant China bashing. - pete</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 04:27:32 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/the-washington-posts-entry-in-the-qhow-many-big-things-can-you-get-wrong-in-a-short-articleq-contest#comment-3829</link>
			<description>[quote]So the administration thinks that it is very important to both speed up and slow down the foreclosure process? That may make sense to the Washington Post, but probably not to anyone else.[/quote]

Oh yeah Mr Commy Mommy?  So free market forces can't move in opposing directions at the same time, is that it?  Well how 'bout this bit of news.  Why are there buyers and sellers in the first place?  Because [i]both benefit from trade[/i] due to conflicting expectations of prices moving in opposite directions don't they?

Finally the White House exhibits an inkling of understanding on how free markets actually work to clear out the housing surplus by mimicking it perfectly and some commie like you comes along and wants to use government interference and socialism to prolong the agony.

Stupid liberals. - izzatzo</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 02:52:08 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
