<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>CEO: We Offer Either a Very Skimpy Health Benefit, or Possibly None at All </title>
		<description>Comments for CEO: We Offer Either a Very Skimpy Health Benefit, or Possibly None at All  at http://www.cepr.net , comment 1 to 2 out of 2 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.cepr.net</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 16:16:48 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/cepr-blog/ceo-we-offer-either-a-very-skimpy-health-benefit-or-possibly-none-at-all#comment-10843</link>
			<description>Actually, that math is correct.  He claimed an $18 million [i]increase[/i], or $30 million total.  I cannot vouch for his figures.  Nor did I catch him saying over how long a period of time that increase took place.  But that does come to 150 percent. - David Rosnick</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 09:35:49 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>and also some poor arithmetic</title>
			<link>http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/cepr-blog/ceo-we-offer-either-a-very-skimpy-health-benefit-or-possibly-none-at-all#comment-10841</link>
			<description>$18m is not a 150% increase on $12m either. A small point, and surely only a mistake from Mr Puzder. - Dom</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 09:03:52 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
