<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Military Budget Cuts: Denominator Please</title>
		<description>Comments for Military Budget Cuts: Denominator Please at http://www.cepr.net , comment 1 to 4 out of 4 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.cepr.net</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 01:09:47 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>A standing army is also unconstitutional</title>
			<link>http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/military-budget-cuts-denominator-please#comment-14463</link>
			<description>Article 1 Section 8 of the constitution, enumerating the powers of Congress, includes, [i]&quot;To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years.&quot;[/i]

One should note, also, that not only is the $487/$600 billion a very small percentage of our military spending, but the cut is not a reduction of [u]present[/u] spending but is a reduction of [u]proposed future[/u] spending. That means that military spending will not decrease at all, it will merely increase to a lesser degree.
 - Bill H</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 19:50:15 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Should Never Have Been A Standing Army</title>
			<link>http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/military-budget-cuts-denominator-please#comment-14459</link>
			<description>Most people don't realize that having a standing Army and Marine Corps is a relatively new thing in American history and far from the Founders intent.  They were deeply skeptical of having a standing army, and instead envisioned state and local militias that would come together in a time of war, under a Commander-in-Chief.  That is also the origin of the 2nd Amendment.  A standing army is extremely expensive, leads to more wars not less, and is corrosive to a democratic republic.  Where are the right-wing Constitution worshippers on this??? - Stephen Kriz</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 07:08:38 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Oh! Oh! I have an idea!</title>
			<link>http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/military-budget-cuts-denominator-please#comment-14451</link>
			<description>Why don't we end military aid here before we start cutting wages and benefits:
[url]http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/27/opinion/in-honduras-a-mess-helped-by-the-us.html?ref=opinion[/url]
I mean, I know you get a real bang for your buck-- undermining labor rights and all... - Kat</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 02:36:32 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/military-budget-cuts-denominator-please#comment-14443</link>
			<description>Also worth noting that we spend far, far more on military than any other country. - RZ0</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 00:59:55 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
