<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>NYT Discovers Retirement Income Problem</title>
		<description>Comments for NYT Discovers Retirement Income Problem at http://www.cepr.net , comment 1 to 2 out of 2 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.cepr.net</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 18:52:01 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>NYT Doesn't Discover  Income Problem</title>
			<link>http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/nyt-discovers-retirement-income-problem#comment-19059</link>
			<description>California workers don't have a retirement income problem , the have an income problem. If workers had obtained a proportion of their increased productivity 
since 1970, they would be able to supplement Social Security , and maintain a decent lifestyle through their working years.

Without having sufficient income to maintain a middle class/ working class lifestyle, workers will not contribute to the 401k, which is a perfectly appropriate choice.

Most 'solutions' fail to factor in opportunity cost : having $100  when you are in your twenties is worth far more than having $100 in your seventies. 
 - John Yard</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2012 07:44:51 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/nyt-discovers-retirement-income-problem#comment-19057</link>
			<description>It's not even an new idea in California.  Arnie proposed it back in '05. - PeonInChief</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2012 06:03:00 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
