<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>If Manufacturing Jobs Aren't Coming Back, Will We Be Able To Produce Manufactured Goods Without ...</title>
		<description>Comments for If Manufacturing Jobs Aren't Coming Back, Will We Be Able To Produce Manufactured Goods Without Workers? at http://www.cepr.net , comment 1 to 7 out of 7 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.cepr.net</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 12:27:25 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/if-manufacturing-jobs-arent-coming-back-will-we-be-able-to-produce-manufactured-goods-without-workers#comment-19677</link>
			<description>Nevertheless, skyman, while it is true that manufacturing productivity growth has been reducing employment in the sector across the globe, manufacturing employment declined much faster in the U.S. in the 2000-2011 period than in most other industrialized countries. Call it a fetish if you want, but it is still an unnecessary loss of 2-3 million good jobs.   - urban legend</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:08:38 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/if-manufacturing-jobs-arent-coming-back-will-we-be-able-to-produce-manufactured-goods-without-workers#comment-19671</link>
			<description>Actually my point was that, even if we manufactured treadmills, iphones, tvs, and anything else here the cost of labor would dictate a mostly automated assembly/construction process NOT manual. So even if we had Foxconn plants right here, they'd employ a fraction of the workforce they do in China because, with wages so cheap, there is no incentive to mechanize. Here there is. Car plants were an example, so you would have failed my exam by being too narrow-minded. The broader discussion is that we're fetishistizing manufacturing when, in reality, it will NEVER employ the people it used to even if everything we consume is made here. Furthermore, the downstream employment effects will not be as great either. Get into 2012. - skyman123</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 06:57:11 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re 1952 v. 2012 : how many iphones, cell phones and treadmills were made in 1952?</title>
			<link>http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/if-manufacturing-jobs-arent-coming-back-will-we-be-able-to-produce-manufactured-goods-without-workers#comment-19660</link>
			<description>A better set of questions than how many workers were in a 1952 auto plant compared to today is:

1. How many home treadmills were made in 1952?
2. How many automatic supermarket teller systems were produced?
3. How many iphones? LED big screen televisions? How many self-cleaning ovens? What about plug-in air fresheners?

The point: the ever increasing diversity of manufactured goods will more than make up for the increases in efficiency from individual plants. To see America's future, check out South Korea..... a number of the streets of Seoul have been converted to marble.  - Alex Hamilton</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 19:02:20 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>jobs</title>
			<link>http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/if-manufacturing-jobs-arent-coming-back-will-we-be-able-to-produce-manufactured-goods-without-workers#comment-19659</link>
			<description>interesting that the us bureau of economic analysis shows a loss of 4 million manufacturing jobs since 2002. we now have about 11 million manufacturing jobs. china has well over 10 times that, with a population only 4 times as large as ours. why is this? well trade agreements allow manufacturers to offshore their labor. so what the democrats fail to tell you is new employment is deadend jobs, caregivers, janitors, motel maids, convenience store clerks which all pay minimum wage with no benefits. so the american worker is in a pickle, underemployed if employed at all. probably owes more on his home than it's worth, if he isn't in foreclosure. what people did when wages stopped growing with inflation was the wife would go to work too. when this wasn't sufficient, people took out a second mortgage. then they put everything on credit. but today 150 million americans are tapped out. our economy is based on consumption. but if you have 150 million americans behind the 8-ball, they can't consume. no matter which dummy is elected 11-6, the economy won't improve, it's mathematically impossible given today's circumstances.    - mel in oregon</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 14:19:47 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/if-manufacturing-jobs-arent-coming-back-will-we-be-able-to-produce-manufactured-goods-without-workers#comment-19658</link>
			<description>Two points.  First, when Asian countries decide to start basing their economies on domestic demand instead of subsidizing exports to the US, our exports to them won't necessarily increase.  It would be rational for them to construct high protectionist barriers.  

Second, if the US does indeed have increased manufacturing in the future, why wouldn't we see the same thing thing that happened to the construction and service industries: labor demand stimulating an illegal migration.  For the purposes of improving the lives of American workers it's completely meaningless to discuss getting the dollar down without discussing how to seal the border.   - Jack</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 13:30:07 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/if-manufacturing-jobs-arent-coming-back-will-we-be-able-to-produce-manufactured-goods-without-workers#comment-19657</link>
			<description>[quote]If we moved to balanced trade and manufacturing adjusted in accordance to its share of total trade, it would imply an increase in manufacturing output of close to 30 percent. Unless we have extraordinary gains in productivity, this would mean considerably more employment in the sector. [/quote]

Depends on how fast we move to balanced trade if it is slow it can be covered by growth in productivity.   - Floccina</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 11:14:11 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>When smart people miss the boat</title>
			<link>http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/if-manufacturing-jobs-arent-coming-back-will-we-be-able-to-produce-manufactured-goods-without-workers#comment-19654</link>
			<description>This conversation always amazes me when seemingly intelligent people say really dumb things. Let's start here: given the improvements in technology and the ubiquitous nature of the internet, please describe the effects on traditional manufacturing. In your discussion please theorize about the ascendance of using machines to do most of the work of humans in the past (parts deliveries, ordering, stocking, robotic and the like). Given that it is possible with current communications technologies now to locate people anywhere in the world, how does this affect downstream job formation? What is the size of the average factory workforce in 2012? In 1980? In 1952? What percentage of these jobs, can you demonstrate, are loss do to increased technological advancement? Extra Credit: name 3 auto factories opened from scratch in the last 10 years. How many people do they employ? In 1955, how many people would a similar plant employ and why the difference? - skyman123</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 10:30:31 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
