<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Does Dana Milbank Ever Notice the Unemployment Rate?</title>
		<description>Comments for Does Dana Milbank Ever Notice the Unemployment Rate? at http://www.cepr.net , comment 1 to 5 out of 5 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.cepr.net</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 18:46:50 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>relying on CBO projections?</title>
			<link>http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/does-dana-milbank-ever-notice-the-unemployment-rate#comment-22100</link>
			<description>CBO, that crew and their projections are on par with Mitt Romeney's election forecast team.

“Back in 2001 the CBO forecast total 2011 public debt would be negative $2.4 trillion; instead the real number was positive $10.4 trillion, a delta of only $12.8 trillion. We also won't spend much time on the just released CBO headline grabbing projection that the 2013 budget deficit will be under $1 trillion, or $845 billion to be precise. Instead we will show the progression of the CBO's baseline forecasts for the period 2012 and onward. We will also note that the now-forecast 2013 budget deficit of $845 billion was supposed to be a deficit of just $585 billion one short year ago, a token 40%+ error rate, but in the immortal words of Hillary Clinton: &quot;who cares.&quot;

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-02-05/cbo-releases-latest-budget-forecast-hilarity-ensues - phil m</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 15:00:13 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Spread this meme</title>
			<link>http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/does-dana-milbank-ever-notice-the-unemployment-rate#comment-22096</link>
			<description>Thanks for including the little nugget, [quote][The] CBO's projections for Medicare costs have actually fallen by more than the cuts originally advocated by Bowles and Simpson[/quote]. 
That fact should be thrown in the face of anyone citing Simpson, Bowles, or the other Medicare cutting cabal. &quot;Look, there's not need to make cuts, they've already been made!&quot;

 - David M</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 03:43:18 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/does-dana-milbank-ever-notice-the-unemployment-rate#comment-22094</link>
			<description>Dunno, Dana . . . looks to me like the deficit is shrinking. . .
http://research.stlouisfed.org/fredgraph.png?g=fLv - RZ0</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:10:34 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/does-dana-milbank-ever-notice-the-unemployment-rate#comment-22093</link>
			<description>Dean, the post starts with a sentence fragment.  I think you meant to write something like &quot;must be wondering&quot; after Simpson. - George Lantos</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:09:47 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Creditability of The Elite</title>
			<link>http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/does-dana-milbank-ever-notice-the-unemployment-rate#comment-22092</link>
			<description>Well said; yet, Milbank will continue to appear on MSNBC as an expert to showcase his vast knowledge of current events and major affairs affecting all of us.

 - James</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 12:11:06 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
