CEPR - Center for Economic and Policy Research

Multimedia

En Español

Em Português

Other Languages

Home Publications Op-Eds & Columns Employee Free Choice Act Could Be Biggest Reform Since New Deal

Employee Free Choice Act Could Be Biggest Reform Since New Deal

Print
Mark Weisbrot
Miami Herald
, September 1, 2008
Olympian (WA), August 28, 2008
Lake Wylie Pilot (SC), August 28, 2008
Bellingham Herald
(WA), August 28, 2008
Bluffton Island Packet
(SC), August 28, 2008
News and Observer
(NC), August 28, 2008
Modesto Bee
(CA), August 28, 2008
Sacramento Bee
(CA), August 28, 2008
Kennewick T
ri-City Herald (WA), August 28, 2008
Fresno Bee (CA), August 28, 2008
Belleville News-Democrat (IL), August 28, 2008
Tacoma Tribune (WA), August 29, 2008
Columbia State (SC), August 29, 2008
Anchorage Daily News (AK), August 29, 2008
Rock Hill Herald (SC), August 29, 2008
Janesville Gazette (WI), August 30, 2008
Las Vegas Review-Journal, August 30, 2008
Duluth News-Tribune (MN), August 31, 2008
Arizona Sunday Star (AZ), August 31, 2008
Charleston Sunday Gazette (WV), August 31, 2008
Cape Cod Times (MA), September 1, 2008
Grand Forks Herald (ND), September 1, 2008
Billings Sunday Gazette (MT), September 1, 2008
Columbus Dispatch (OH), September 1, 2008
Norfolk Virginian Pilot (VA), September 1, 2008
Kansas City Star (MO), September 1, 2008
Lincoln Journal Star (NE), September 1, 2008
Newport Daily News (RI), September 2, 2008
Wisconsin State Journal, September 3, 2008
Alternet, September 16, 2008
Citizen-Times (NC), October 17, 2008

While it hasn’t gotten much attention, one of the most important issues that our elections this November could decide is the future of organized labor in the United States. This is important not just for the 15.7 million workers who happen to be in unions, but for the vast majority of the entire 154 million-member U.S. labor force. The wages, benefits, and working conditions of most employees are affected by collective bargaining even if they don’t have a union. For example, employers who want to keep unions out will sometimes have to offer their workers such amenities as health insurance.

One of the most important problems that our economy has faced for the last 30 years has been stagnating real wages. With inflation now running at 10.6 percent over the last quarter, the problem appears to most people to be rising prices, including food and energy. But for more than two decades prior to the past year, inflation has been tame. Yet the real – inflation-adjusted -- wage of the typical employee barely increased at all over the whole 34 years from 1973-2007.

This is amazing, when we consider that productivity – the amount that workers produce per hour – increased quite substantially over the period. Measured very conservatively, if we take “usable productivity” – the increased production that we can expect to be reflected in rising wages – it rose by 48 percent from 1973-2007. So our economy grows but, unlike in the past, most employees do not share in the gains.

One important reason for this great leap backwards is that the rights of workers to organize and bargain collectively have been sharply curtailed over the last three decades.

For example, employees still have the legal right to petition for a federally-run election at their workplace, in which workers can vote on whether or not to join a union. To get such an election, they need the signatures of at least 30 percent of the employees. But after the employees get enough signatures for the election, employers very often intimidate workers through threats and firings before the vote is held. The Center for Economic and Policy Research has estimated that one in five workers who are actively involved in a union organizing drive can expect to be fired. Many others are “persuaded” to vote against the union through a long, captive audience campaign of employer threats and harassment.

As a result of these tactics, only about 12 percent of employees are organized in unions today, as compared with 35 percent in the 1950s. Reform legislation called the Employee Free Choice Act would give employees a fighting chance to regain some of their lost rights. This bill would mandate that an employer recognize the union if it obtains the signatures of a majority of employees. There would be no need for the long and costly – especially to the workers who are fired – election campaign.

A poll by Global Strategies Group this month found that 68 percent of middle-class Americans support the Employee Free Choice Act. Polls also indicate that tens of millions would join a union if they had the choice.

The bill passed the House 241-185 but was filibustered by Republicans in the Senate. It’s a party-line split in the Senate (except for support from Republican Senator Arlen Specter). So the bill would need a Democratic president and something close to 59 Democrats in the Senate in order to pass.

This law would probably change Americans’ lives more than any legislation since the New Deal brought us Social Security. The political influence of millions of new union members would also bring us closer to such basic reforms as universal health care. It’s all long overdue.
Mark Weisbrot is co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research, in Washington, D.C. He received his Ph.D. in economics from the University of Michigan. He is co-author, with Dean Baker, of Social Security: The Phony Crisis (University of Chicago Press, 2000), and has written numerous research papers on economic policy. He is also president of Just Foreign Policy (www.justforeignpolicy.org).
 

CEPR.net
donate_new
Combined Federal Campaign #79613

Op-Eds by Author

Mark Weisbrot

Dean Baker

Eileen Appelbaum

John Schmitt