Twenty Years After Iran-Contra, Washington's Role in Nicaragua Still a Scandal
By Mark Weisbrot
This article was published in the following news outlets:
Bergen County Record (NJ) - November 3, 2006
Passaic County HeraldNews (NJ) - November 3, 2006
Imagine Osama bin Laden visiting the United States ten or 15 years
from now, telling Americans who to vote for if they want to avoid
getting hurt. It would never happen, but in Nicaragua something very
similar is happening in the run-up to their election on November 5.
Former US Lt. Col. Oliver North, who helped organize and raise funds
for a terrorist organization that decimated Nicaragua in the 1980s,
returned to that country’s ground zero in late October to warn the
citizens there against re-electing Daniel Ortega.
Ortega first came to power in a 1979 revolution led by the
Sandinistas, which overthrew the brutal Washington-backed dictatorship
of Anastasio Somoza. The Somoza family had ruled the country since US
Marines invaded and occupied Nicaragua from 1927-1933.
But the US Central Intelligence Agency soon brought guns and money
to the enforcers of the toppled dictatorship, Somoza’s hated National
Guard. Before long these re-named “contras” were killing health care
workers, teachers, and elected officials – the CIA actually prepared a
manual which advocated the assassination of the latter. The contras
preferred attacking these “soft targets” rather than the national armed
forces. In that sense they were very much a terrorist organization;
they also used torture and rape as political weapons.
These atrocities brought the contras universal condemnation from
humans rights groups such as Amnesty International and Americas Watch.
The Sandinistas took the United States to the World Court for its
terrorist actions—the same court where the US had won a judgment
against Iran just a few years earlier, for the taking of American
hostages. The court ruled in favor of Nicaragua, ordering reparations
estimated at $17 billion.
The heinous nature of these crimes and the direct involvement of the
Reagan Administration disgusted millions of Americans, even more so
after Ortega was democratically elected in 1984. Led by activists in
the religious community, some hundreds of thousands of US citizens
organized against US funding for the contras and convinced Congress to
cut it off. That’s where Ollie North came in: on behalf of the Reagan
Administration, he illegally sold arms to Iran and used the proceeds to
fund the contras. This became the infamous “Iran-Contra” scandal of
twenty years ago.
North was convicted of various felonies for his Iran-Contra crimes,
but never served time because his conviction was overturned due to a
technicality on appeal. In 1990 the Sandinistas were voted out of
office by a public weary of war, with President George H.W. Bush making
it clear that the violence would continue if the Sandinistas were
re-elected.
Nicaragua’s economy never recovered from the war and the US embargo.
Today it is the second poorest country in the hemisphere, with a per
capita income less than it was in 1960.
Now Washington is trying to capitalize on its past terrorism,
combined with present threats, to achieve the same result as in 1990.
US Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez warned that “relations with our
country have been limited and damaged when the Sandinistas have been in
power” and Republican Congressman Dana Rohrabacher warned of another
economic embargo and the cutoff of vital remittances that Nicaraguans
here send home to their families. The US Ambassador to Nicaragua Paul
Trivelli has also breached protocol by openly warning that the United
States would “reevaluate relations” with Nicaragua if Ortega, who has
first place in the polls with 35 percent, wins.
U.S. officials’ intervention has gone so far as to prompt a public
rebuke from the Organization of American States, who asked them to stay
out of the election. Meanwhile, millions of US taxpayer dollars are
funding “democracy promotion” activities in Nicaragua, which have
previously been used to influence elections there. And TV commercials
show footage of corpses from the 1980’s war, a warning of what might
happen if Nicaraguans vote the “wrong” way.
Ortega has since lost many of his former allies, who denounced him
for making a “pact” with the corrupt former president Arnoldo Aleman
and undermining democracy. A reform Sandinista group has entered the
race and its presidential candidate Edmundo Jarquin is polling at about
14 percent.
But whatever the electoral result in Nicaragua, Washington’s
intervention in this election remains – as it was in the 1980s – an
international disgrace for the United States.
Mark Weisbrot is Co-Director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research, in Washington, DC.
|