Threat of Deflation is Exaggerated
By Mark Weisbrot
July 2, 2003 - Knight-Ridder/Tribune Information Services
A specter is haunting America
(and Europe) -- the specter of deflation. Talk of deflation has moved financial
markets, influenced the statements of the Federal Reserve, and gotten a lot of
people worried that the United States could be headed toward a prolonged period
of economic stagnation. The most feared example is that of Japan, which has been
mired in a slow-growth swamp since its stock market and real estate bubbles
burst in 1989.
What is deflation and how much
should we be worried about it? Deflation refers to a sustained fall in the
general price level -- the opposite of inflation. Most of us are not old enough
to have lived through the Great Depression, so although we have seen falling
prices for individual products (for example, computers) we have not experienced
a prolonged drop in overall prices.
There is no doubt that deflation,
were it to happen here, could create problems for our economy. But the threat
has been exaggerated, and misunderstood, in several ways.
First it is important to realize
that if the Consumer Price Index were to turn negative for a few months or even
a year, this would not necessarily spell doom for the U.S. economy. The scary
scenario that is often presented is a vicious cycle: the Fed can't lower
interest rates below zero, so that weapon is gone when prices are falling.
Consumers postpone purchases that they know will soon be cheaper, further
reducing demand. Debtors (most consumers and home buyers) see the value of their
debts rise relative to their incomes and other prices.
But most of this scenario is true
when there is no deflation but inflation is falling -- for example, when the
rate of inflation drops from 4 percent to 2 percent. And with short-term
interest rates now at 1.0 percent, the Fed is already at the point where it
doesn't have much left in the way of stimulating the economy through lower
short-term rates.
The real danger comes if deflation
persists -- then the problem of falling demand and increasing debt burdens
become cumulatively worse. But there's no need to panic: it's not that difficult
for policy makers to make prices rise if they really want to do so. The central
bank (our Federal Reserve) can create all the money that it wants to create, and
thereby drive prices back up.
The Japanese Central Bank was not
aggressive enough in doing this, but that doesn't mean that our Fed would have
to make the same mistakes. It's true that central banks tend to err on the side
of slow growth -- most of our recessions in the post-World-War- II period
(including the one before last, 1990-91) were actually brought on by the Fed
raising interest rates at the wrong time, or too much.
But that is a different problem --
a political one. It means that if deflation were to start, our elected officials
and the public might have to pressure the Fed to do the right thing. It does not
mean that deflation is inherently a vicious cycle that, once begun, is difficult
to break out of.
Prolonged deflation is not all
that likely anyway, at least for now. The Fed recognized that in their May 6
meeting, seeing it as "only a remote possibility," partly because the
dollar's decline against foreign currencies will raise the price of our imports.
Interestingly, the Fed's public statement at the time was different, giving the
financial markets the impression that the Fed saw deflation as a more serious
danger.
Of course, our economy still faces
serious weaknesses: business investment has yet to recover, and consumers can
only add so much to their debt, which is already at record levels relative to
income. The weak labor market adds to the problem of lack of demand, as do the
massive spending cutbacks (and some tax increases) by financially strapped state
governments.
And perhaps worst of all, there is
a bubble in housing prices -- similar to the stock market bubble that burst in
2000 -- that could "disappear" some $3 trillion in homeowners' wealth.
So there are plenty of rocks in the
road to economic recovery. No need to be overly alarmist about the dangers of
deflation.
|