May 1, 2007 En español
IMF's Support for Coup Government in 2002 May Have Influenced Venezuela's Decision to Withdraw from the Fund
For Immediate Release: May 1, 2007
Contact: Dan Beeton, 202-293-5380 x104
WASHINGTON, D.C. - The Government of Venezuela yesterday
announced it would leave the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World
Bank. President Hugo Chavez announced the move saying, "We will no
longer have to go to Washington, nor to the IMF, nor to the World Bank,
not to anyone." The move is an unprecedented decision by a
government to break with the IMF and World Bank, and follows the
institutions' plummeting influence in Latin America in recent
years.
Venezuela's relationship with the IMF over the last few years has been
troubled. Most notably, on April 12, 2002, IMF spokesperson Thomas Dawson
publicly stated that the Fund was "ready to assist the new
administration [of Pedro Carmona] in whatever manner they find
suitable." Dawson's statement came in a press conference only hours
after Chavez was removed from office in a military coup d'etat in the
middle of the night. Video and a transcript of the IMF press briefing,
including Dawson's statement, is available on the
IMF's
website.
"This was an unprecedented, surprise announcement from the IMF at
the time," said Mark Weisbrot, Co-Director of the Center for
Economic and Policy Research. "The Fund is typically cautious about
determining whether a new government is eligible for its lending, even
when it is an elected government. In this case, the Fund determined
almost instantly that the coup government would be a suitable
partner."
It is likely that the U.S. government influenced the IMF's behavior. The
U.S. Treasury Department has effective veto power over the Fund, and
declassified U.S. government documents reveal that Washington had advance
knowledge of the coup. Despite this advance knowledge, once the coup was
underway, both the White House and State Department stated publicly that
what had transpired was not a coup d'etat, but a popular uprising.
(
Click here for links to the documents and more information).
In the video, it is clear that Dawson was reading from a prepared
statement, even though he responded to a question from an Associated
Press reporter about Venezuela. It is therefore likely that Dawson was
speaking for the Fund, although it is not clear how IMF management could
have reached a decision about the new government so quickly after the
coup.
The Venezuelan government has also recently expressed dissatisfaction
with the
IMF's persistently pessimistic projections for Venezuela's economic
growth. Venezuela, along with Argentina, has led the region in growth
over the last few years. Yet the IMF has continued to lowball Venezuela's
economic growth since 2003. In the fall of 2004, it projected 3.5 percent
growth in 2005, which came in at 10.3 percent in 2005, for a 6.8
percentage point underestimate. For 2006, the IMF's fall 2005 estimate
was 4.5 percent, while growth was again 10.3 percent - an underestimate
of 5.8 percentage points.
Timeline of the April 2002 coup d'etat in Venezuela:
April 11, 2002:
At 10:20 p.m., National Guard Gen. Alberto Camacho Kairuz announces
that President Chávez has abandoned his functions and that the armed
forces are in control.
April 12, 2002:
At 3:25 a.m., Gen. Lucas Rincón Romero announces that Chávez has
resigned and is in custody. At 4:55 a.m., Pedro Carmona announces he has
been named president.
This means that the IMF could only have known that there was a "new
administration" for several hours, at most, when its spokesperson
Thomas
Dawson stated on April 12, about 9:45 a.m.(according to the IMF
transcript) that "we [the IMF] stand ready to assist the new
administration in whatever manner they find suitable."
|