IMF Surcharges Can Be Removed as Precautionary Balances Are Safely Within Target

December 08, 2022

Surcharges Fact Sheet

On December 12, 2022, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) will complete its biannual review of the adequacy of its precautionary balances. The last review — which was extraordinary in nature due to some member countries’ concerns around the Fund’s “surcharge” policy — took place in December 2021. Surcharges are additional fees that the IMF charges countries with relatively large and long-term loans; they significantly increase the debt payments that these countries must make to the Fund, siphoning away scarce foreign exchange and budget resources. 

When the IMF has positive net earnings, they are retained and added to its “precautionary balances,” a subsection of its capital reserves. The Fund has an indicative target in the range of SDR 20–25 billion ($26.0–32.5 billion) for its precautionary balances, and a floor of SDR 15 billion ($19.5 billion). As of April 2022, the Fund’s precautionary balances were SDR 20.9 billion ($28.1 billion). Based on its first quarter net operational income and this year’s gross lending income, I estimate that as of November 2022, the IMF’s precautionary balances have reached SDR 23.0 billion ($30.2 billion).

The Fund’s net income at financial year-end in April 2022 was positive. In fact, it would have been positive even without surcharges. During the three months ending in July 2022 (the IMF’s most recently published financial statements), the Fund’s net income was positive, thus precautionary balances grew. It would have remained positive even if surcharges had been completely removed. As shown in Figure 1, this has been the tendency over the last decade (except for one year: 2016). 

In financial year 2022, the IMF generated $1.7 billion in surcharges, but its net operational income was $2.2 billion. In the three months ending July 2022, the IMF took in about $460 million in surcharges, but its net operational income was almost $1.2 billion, much more than its surcharge revenue.

Figure 1

While the IMF has previously argued that surcharges are essential for the “revolving nature” of the Fund, the precautionary balances target is a mere 3.5 percent of the Fund’s total trillion-dollar lending power. Yearly surcharge income is an almost negligible 0.18 percent of the IMF’s total resources available for lending. The Fund’s lending power is not genuinely impacted by surcharges.

A year ago, the IMF argued that even with surcharges, the rates that large borrowers pay the Fund are lower than hypothetical market rates. Market rates are currently prohibitive for surcharge-paying countries — and are likely to remain so for the foreseeable future — even considering the fact that surcharge-paying borrowers are under heavily monitored IMF programs. It is therefore not reasonable to compare effective IMF borrowing rates with inaccessible market rates. 

In the context of rapidly rising interest rates, the IMF’s basic lending rate is increasing and, with it, its regular lending income. Surcharges are an unnecessary burden on debtor countries. The IMF does not publish country-by-country details on surcharge payments, but it is clear that the marginal interest rate of the main surcharge-paying debtors is now over 6.8 percent.

Surcharges are not mentioned anywhere in the IMF’s Articles of Agreement. To the contrary, the founding treaty establishes a unique, de facto senior-creditor-status rate of charge for all debtor countries. For the sake of all parties’ legal certainty, member countries should request that the precautionary balances review also consider this added burden that, according to United Nations human rights officials, threatens national and international prosperity. 

The IMF’s precautionary balances are now both safely above the floor and in the midpoint of the indicative target. And balances are growing progressively over time without the need for surcharges, especially given rising interest rates. With the IMF projecting a steady increase in the amount of countries that will pay surcharges, largely as a result of external economic shocks, it is the right moment for surcharges to be safely terminated.

Support Cepr


If you value CEPR's work, support us by making a financial contribution.

Si valora el trabajo de CEPR, apóyenos haciendo una contribución financiera.

Donate Apóyanos

Keep up with our latest news